Laserfiche WebLink
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota <br />Management Report, Page 13 <br />The amount listed as "City property" totaled $142,553 at December 31, 1988. The City <br />acquired these properties in order to recover the assessments levied against some of these <br />properties. The City has received clearance to permit development of these lots from various <br />authorities (Army Corps of Engineers and State DNR). The City intends to sell the properties and <br />recover the related assessments. The City had determined that the amounts will not be fully <br />recoverable. The City has received bids on the property and is currently litigating a settlement. <br />In addition to the above parcels which are subject to sale, the City had additional City lots (City <br />Hall) which were assessed in 1988. An alternative procedure to assessing City property is to adopt <br />a property tax levy or other City funding source to pay for the cost of assessments which benefit <br />either City property directly or the City of Lino Lakes' overall system. Examples of such <br />assessments are laterals for City Hall property, park property or general benefit improvements such <br />as lift stations and water storage facilities. The City generally would not "pay itself' for <br />assessments on property that it owns. These amounts are commonly included in the fmancing <br />arrangements as a property tax element of the bond issue. We recommend that the City consider <br />alternate procedures relative to assessments which benefit City property or which improve the <br />City's overall core water and sewer distribution systems. <br />The City collects special assessments through Anoka County. This agency arrangement has <br />advantages to the City primarily in saving administrative time and effort required to bill and collect <br />special assessments. A certain level of control, however, is lost through the agency arrangement <br />insofar as accounting records are located and maintained at both the County and the City. <br />Correlation of these records is required to assure accurate tabulation of receivables and amounts <br />received. In order to assure that the City's best interests are guarded, the City should improve <br />internal records with regard to special assessments and compare such records periodically to <br />County records. Additionally, Anoka County is not providing detail of penalty and interest on <br />delinquent collections. In light of the magnitude of past delinquencies, this allocation should be <br />provided. We recommend that the City request improved data from the County. <br />The above procedures will allow the City greater assurance that all of its special assessments <br />are properly spread for collection. Additionally, the City will have the ability to generate year end <br />balances for annual financial reporting with greater ease and accuracy. The increased level of <br />control required is partially a function of increased assessment activity. Special assessments <br />receivable (City-wide) were less than $100,000 in 1979. Assessments receivable were over $2 <br />