Laserfiche WebLink
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota <br />Management Report, Page 32 <br />Other Projects <br />Lakes #9 <br />Carlson (Woodridge Estates) <br />Pine Oaks Revision <br />Sunrise Meadows <br />Paul Montain <br />Reshanau 3rd Addition <br />Fund Balance <br />December 31 1988 <br />($763) <br />(10,580) * <br />(4,856) <br />(19,438) * <br />701 <br />(3,310) * <br />($38,246) <br />* These projects are anticipated to be financed by 1989 bonding. The remaining projects are in <br />preliminary phases. <br />Project Financing Practices <br />The City has established the practice of excluding final overlay paving from the original <br />bonding for improvement projects. The City does include the gravel base and bituminous base in <br />the initial phase and such amounts are included in the original contracts and in the financing <br />(bonding) plan. The final wearing surface, however, is not constructed until 80% of the homes <br />have been completed. The final paving, therefore, may occur one to two years after the original <br />project is complete. This practice extends the project period from approximately 12 months to <br />possibly in excess of 36 months. Additionally, the final overlays are not financed. These amounts <br />are intended to be paid from the original project. <br />The improvement process and accounting and financial reporting procedures related thereto <br />may be streamlined if the entire construction project is completed within a 12 to 18 month period. <br />Additionally, project financial administration will be improved if the entire project is financed with <br />the original bond issue. The delay for the final overlay creates requirements to split assessment roll <br />receipts from those which were for the original project (already constructed) and those for a <br />supplemental project to occur 12 to 18 months in the future (final overlays). The Rice Lake Estates <br />construction project was substantially complete at December 31, 1987. Final paving was not <br />however completed as of December 31, 1988. The City has therefore elected to retain the <br />construction fund to account for future construction projects. The construction fund however, has <br />over $370,000 in cash which is committed to the Permanent Improvement Bonds of 1988 which <br />were used to refinance the Temporary Improvement Bonds of 1985. The affect of this situation is <br />to cause a temporary cash overdraft in the Improvement Bonds of 1988 Debt Service Fund. <br />