My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
Management Report and Recommendations 12/31/1988
LinoLakes
>
Finance
>
Annual Financial Statements
>
Management Report and Recommendations 12/31/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/19/2014 11:30:29 AM
Creation date
5/19/2014 11:16:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Finance Dept
Finance Category
Audit
Finance Document Folder
Annual Financial Reports
Finance Number Identifier
Management Report and Recommendations
Date
12/31/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota <br />Management Report, Page 38 <br />The City is in the process of establishing Tax Increment Financing District 1 -2. This district <br />will qualify as a Economic Development TIF district pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.174, <br />subdivision 12. Part of required annual financial disclosure with the State of Minnesota is to <br />include in the annual financial report specific information regarding tax increment financing <br />districts. Part of that required information is the original value of the district which is used to <br />calculate the captured value as development is completed and property values increase. Part of the <br />process is to certify the tax increment financing district with Anoka County to freeze the original <br />value of the district. Audit inquiries with Anoka County indicate that the certification of the district <br />with the County has not yet been completed. Delays in certifying the district may have adverse <br />affects on subsequent captured valuation formulas (i.e., if the original value goes up for interim <br />improvements, the original value of the district will be higher, and therefore, the captured value <br />which generates tax increments will be lower). We recommend that the City review this situation <br />and determine what additional procedures will be required to certify the district and that the City <br />refrain from committing financial resources to district improvements until the original value of the <br />district is properly certified. <br />Construction Fund Accounting <br />The City maintained twenty seven Capital Project Funds in 1988. Some of these funds do not <br />require separate fund accounting and would be more efficiently combined with other projects <br />which have a common funding source. A change in fund structure would be consistent with <br />established (generally accepted) accounting principles as promulgated by the National Council on <br />Governmental Accounting (NCGA) and as adopted by the Governmental Accounting Standards <br />Board (GASB). An excerpt from NCGA Statement 1 on this matter is as follows: <br />Govemmental units should establish and maintain those funds required by <br />law and sound financial administration. Only the minimum number of <br />funds consistent with legal and operating requirements should be <br />established, however, since unnecessary funds result in inflexibility, undue <br />complexity and inefficient financial administration. <br />The City's accounting system was a manual system which was not conducive to departmental <br />accounting practices required to maintain an Interim Construction Fund. The City had therefore <br />reverted to the practice of establishing a separate fund for each construction project. The City <br />acquired a new computer system in 1989. The system, however is not fully implemented. We <br />recommend that the City use the new system to establish departmental accounting for interim <br />construction projects and other commonly financed projects. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.