Laserfiche WebLink
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota <br />Management Report, Page 47 <br />Our study and evaluation made for the limited purpose described in the first <br />paragraph would not necessarily disclose all material weaknesses in the system. <br />Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the system of internal accounting <br />control of the City of Lino Lakes taken as a whole. However, our study and eva- <br />luation disclosed that a substantial portion of the accounting processes are per- <br />formed by a single employee. Ideal conditions call for segregation of duties to <br />establish a system of internal testing of procedures performed. Additionally, <br />our evaluation disclosed that the City does not maintain a system of control over <br />fixed assets. These conditions are common to cities of this size. Any modifica- <br />tion of internal controls in these areas must be viewed from a cost /benefit <br />perspective. <br />These conditions were considered in determining the nature, timing, and <br />extent of the audit tests to be applied in our examination of the December 31, <br />1987 financial statements, and this report does not affect our report on the <br />financial statements dated May 27, 1988. <br />This report is intended solely for the use of the City of Lino Lakes and <br />should not be used for any other purpose. <br />Budgeting <br />The City currently budgets certain revenues on a combined basis. Additionally, as <br />discussed earlier in this report, certain debt levies are not clearly segregated from <br />operating levies in the budget. Also, the City may be budgeting in the General Fund <br />certain capital outlay which is scheduled to be funded by equipment certificates (i.e., <br />Capital Project Fund). We recommend that in conjunction with the computer acquisition <br />that budgeting practices be reviewed and automated on the new system. <br />Utility Billing System <br />During 1987 the City did not reconcile utility payments from the utility system to <br />the general ledger. This was due primarily to a turnover in the utility clerk position. <br />During our examination of the utility billing system, it was discovered that payments <br />were not being posted to the utility system in a timely manner. We recommend that the <br />City post payments to the utility system on a timely basis and reconcile payments to the <br />general ledger. <br />