Laserfiche WebLink
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota <br />Management Report, Page 34 <br />Payment for replacing contributed systems entirely through utility revenues may <br />be financially burdensome for the Water and Sewer Fund and the users of such <br />systems. Conversely, full assessment of replacement systems may not be prac- <br />tical and may have statutory challenges (i.e., increase in value of property may <br />not correlate to the assessment amount). <br />An alternative method of financing the replacement of contributed systems is to <br />assess a portion to the benefited property owners based on an established stan- <br />dard life for the system. A system of assessing replacement systems at a pro- <br />portionate rate compared to useful life may be the most practical method. If a <br />system has an established useful life of 50 years and requires replacement after <br />30 years, the property owners would be assessed 60% of the cost of the replace- <br />ment system. Any such policy must be scrutinized by legal counsel to improve <br />the chance of prevailing in a contested assessment. <br />The level of reserve balance to fund asset replacement is dependent upon the <br />City's policy of funding the replacement of the various types of assets of the <br />City. Asset replacements will not be entirely financed from reserve balances of <br />the fund. Adequate reserves, however, allow the City options in dealing with <br />annual outlays related to such asset replacements. <br />3. Emergency and /or unanticipated expenses. The nature of a City's utility systems <br />is such that emergency expenditures are incurred frequently (i.e., major unan- <br />ticipated repairs). Additionally, major expense categories can fluctuate signi- <br />ficantly from year to year (i.e., MWCC, insurance, etc.). An adequate reserve <br />structure allows the City to react to these fluctuations without severely <br />disrupting the financial position of the fund. <br />In summary user rates must be sufficient to cover operating expenses, plus meet the <br />additional financial commitments of the City's Sewer and Water Enterprise Fund. These <br />additional financial commitments are as follows: <br />1. Capital outlay and /or depreciation for the non - system fixed assets (i.e., machi- <br />nery and equipment). <br />2. Future system improvements to be financed directly from user rates .(if any). <br />3. Debt payments (principal and interest) for a portion of the City's Sewer and <br />Water Revenue Bond Issues which are used to finance portions of the City's water <br />and sanitary sewer systems (i.e., water towers; wells; pumphouses; sanitary <br />sewer interceptors and lift stations; and water and sewer overpass). <br />4. Reserve balances for the Sewer and Water Enterprise Fund at sufficient levels to <br />meet current and future City policy. <br />Definition of an "adequate" balance can only be determined through a more thorough <br />study and by an understanding of the City Council's preference in dealing with the <br />various areas discussed above. <br />