Laserfiche WebLink
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota <br />Management Report, Page 33 <br />an increase of 2 %. The combination of these factors increased the City's estimated cost <br />in 1986 by 11 %. As the system gains users, the increased usage part of the overall <br />increase should be offset by the billings to new users. The per unit portion of the <br />increase, however, must be borne in full by existing users or be subsidized by overall <br />City operations. <br />The City has no control over the billings from the MWCC for the sewer treatment <br />costs. This operating expense comprises 66% of the 1985 customer billings for sewer <br />service charges. The City must set rates at levels adequate to pay for the pass through <br />costs from MWCC plus other city expenses. In view of this arrangement with MWCC, the <br />City's ability to exercise control over its sewer operations is limited. The City can <br />be construed to be acting as an agent for the MWCC with regard to sanitary sewer opera- <br />tions. <br />Agency Funds <br />The City maintained three Agency Funds in 1985 as follows: <br />• Contractor's Deposits <br />• Minnesota Housing Revenue Bonds <br />• Investment Fund <br />An Agency Fund is designed to account for transactions for other individuals, pri- <br />vate organizations and /or other funds. <br />The Contractor's Deposits Fund is used to account for "pass through" types of expen- <br />ditures relating to prospective developers. The City pays certain legal, engineering <br />and planning amounts to assure compliance with various City ordinances relating to <br />pertinent applications. The City receives deposits and /or bills the various developers <br />for costs incurred. We recommend that the City continue to maintain detail records of <br />amounts due from developers and that adequate deposits are received prior to incurring <br />expenses on a developer's behalf. <br />