My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
Management Report and Recommendations 12/31/1983
LinoLakes
>
Finance
>
Annual Financial Statements
>
Management Report and Recommendations 12/31/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/19/2014 11:24:14 AM
Creation date
5/19/2014 11:20:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Finance Dept
Finance Category
Audit
Finance Document Folder
Annual Financial Reports
Finance Number Identifier
Management Report and Recommendations
Date
12/31/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Lino Lakes <br />Management Report, Page 11 <br />There are two parcels on an assessment roll which appear on City records as being <br />collectible in 1982 and 1983. The County, however, had not spread the amounts related <br />to these two parcels for 1982. For 1983, the County has spread both the 1982 and 1983 <br />portions for one of the parcels. The remaining parcel is currently being researched by <br />the City to determine if the assessments due in 1983 and 1984 have been recorded. We <br />concur with the City's efforts to determine the remaining balance on this parcel and <br />recommend that the City determine the reason for this type of omission to avoid re- <br />occurances. <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />�1 <br />The City effects special assessment collections through Anoka County as a collection II <br />agent. This agency arrangement has advantages to the City primarily in saving admi- <br />nistrative time and effort required to bill and collect special assessments. A certain <br />level of control, however, is lost through the agency arrangement insofar as accounting <br />records are located and maintained at both the County and the City. Correlation of <br />these records is required to assure accurate tabulation of receivables and amounts <br />received. In order to assure that the City's best interests are guarded, the City <br />should improve internal records with regard to special assessments and compare such <br />records periodically to County records. The following improvements should be con- <br />sidered: <br />1. Maintenance of delinquent assessment records by parcel and fund. This <br />listing can be updated for receipts and adjustments as they occur. Each <br />year this listing should be compared to County records. Any differences <br />should be reconciled and appropriate adjustments made. <br />2. Maintenance of deferred assessment receivable listings. These listings <br />should be updated for prepayments, current portions spread for collection <br />and adjustments such as tax forfeitures. Each year the County spreads a <br />current collectible portion, the City should compare those parcels spread <br />with those on its internal records. <br />3. Maintenance of accounting records for any specially deferred type <br />assessments including tax forfeit assessments. This information should <br />also be compared to County records. <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.