Laserfiche WebLink
City of Lino Lakes <br />Management Report, Page 5 <br />As a consequence of the above reductions (to local government except school <br />districts) 1982 property tax related State aid payments actually decreased from 1981 <br />levels. More important, this decrease represents "lost revenue" to the local government II <br />units. This factor has been viewed by a bond rating agency as a limiting factor in the <br />ability of Minnesota cities to retire bonded debt. This situation can severely and <br />adversely affect the individual bond ratings of all Minnesota cities. <br />The above reductions represent "lost revenue" from tax -levy related State aids. <br />This was not the only "lost revenue" for Minnesota cities in 1982. The State also <br />reduced local government State aid to Minnesota cities, counties and towns, as follows: <br />Year <br />1981- Actual <br />1982 - Certified <br />1982 - Actual <br />City of <br />State Total Lino Lakes <br />Amount Percent Percent <br />(in 1,000's) Change Amount Change <br />$ 249,716 1.69% $ 157,862 7.75% <br />270,725 8.41% 171,011 8.33% <br />235,077 (13.17 %) 148,794 (12.99 %) <br />The above reduction of $35.6 million ($270,725,464 certified to and budgeted by <br />local government; less $235,076,945 actually paid to local government) when added to the <br />$42.1 million reduction in tax -levy related State aids represents "total lost revenue" . II <br />of $77.7 million for 1982. These combined reductions represent approximately 7% of the <br />total 1982 certified tax levies for Minnesota Cities, Counties and Towns. The City of <br />Lino Lakes portion of this "lost revenue" totaled approximately $34,000. <br />The State of Minnesota (as part of its policy of limiting local property tax <br />increases) also adopted a policy of sharing its tax revenues with local government and <br />local taxpayers in the form of aids and credits. The State's primary source of revenue <br />are income taxes (both corporate and personal) and sales taxes. These financial resour- <br />ces comprise over 75% of the State's non - dedicated operating revenue for the State's <br />II General Fund. Total State revenues increased by approximately 3% (each year) during the <br />