My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
Annual Financial Report 12/31/1994
LinoLakes
>
Finance
>
Annual Financial Statements
>
Annual Financial Report 12/31/1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2014 4:28:55 PM
Creation date
5/19/2014 11:52:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Finance Dept
Finance Category
Audit
Finance Number Identifier
Annual Financial Report
Date
12/31/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
32 <br />CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA <br />NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS <br />December 31, 1994 <br />The pension benefit obligations as of June 30, 1994, are shown below: <br />PERF PEPFF <br />(In thousands) <br />Total pension <br />benefit obligation $5,625,598 $1,020,950 <br />Net assets available <br />for benefits, at cost <br />(Market Values for <br />PERF = $4,762,519; <br />PEPFF = $1,237,484) <br />4,733,845 1,229,769 <br />Unfunded (assets in <br />excess of) pension <br />benefit obligation $891,753 ($208,819) <br />The measurement of the pension benefit obligation is based on an actuarial valuation as of June 30, <br />1994. Net assets available to pay pension benefits were valued as of June 30, 1994. <br />For the PERF, significant actuarial assumptions used in the calculation of the pension benefit <br />obligation include (a) a rate of return on the investment of present and future assets of 8.5% per year, <br />compounded annually, prior to retirement, and 5% per year, compounded annually, following <br />retirement; (b) projected salary increases taken from a select and ultimate table; (c) payroll growth at <br />6% per year, consisting of 5% for inflation and 1% due to growth in group size; (d) post- retirement <br />benefit increases that are accounted for by the 5% rate of return assumption following retirement; and <br />(e) mortality rates based on the 1983 Group Annuity Mortality Table set forward one year for retired <br />members and set back five years for each active member. <br />Actuarial assumptions used in the calculation of the PEPFF include (a) a rate of return on the <br />investment of present and future assets of 8.5% per year, compounded annually, prior to retirement, and <br />5% per year, compounded annually, following retirement; (b) projected salary increases of 6.5% per <br />year, compounded annually, attributable to the effects of inflation; (c) post- retirement increases that are <br />accounted for by the 5% rate of return assumption following retirement; and (d) mortality rates based on <br />the 1971 Group Annuity Mortality Table projected to 1984 for males and females. <br />Changes in Plan Provisions <br />The 1994 legislative session did not include any benefit improvements which would impact funding <br />costs for the PERF and the PEPFF. <br />Changes in Actuarial Assumptions <br />Prior to fiscal year 1994, the salary increase assumption and the mortality tables used in the calculation <br />of pension benefit obligation for the PERF were the same as those specified for the PEPFF. For the <br />July 1, 1994 actuarial valuation, PERA's board of trustees approved new mortality rates updated to the <br />1983 Group Annuity Mortality Table, salary increases which were changed to a select and ultimate <br />table and a new payroll growth assumption which was changed from 6.5% to 6 %. These changes were <br />made to reflect actual experience of the plan. <br />With the adoption of the actuarial assumption changes and the new mortality tables for the PERF, the <br />pension benefit obligation increased $56,596,000. The actuarial assumption changes also necessitated <br />a $81,201,000 transfer from the PERF Benefit Reserve to the PERF Minnesota Post Retirement <br />Investment Fund (MPRIF) Reserve to finance the increased obligation for future retirement benefits. <br />The change in the mortality rate assumption increased the PERFs costs because pensioners are living <br />longer than assumed previously. The change in the salary increase assumption, however, offset some <br />of the additional costs because lower salary increases generally translate into lower benefit liabilities in <br />the future. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.