Laserfiche WebLink
Item No. 2. The draft plan currently calls for biannual reviews to keep the plan up to <br />date. To address Item No. 2 staff has proposed additional language to be inserted as <br />follows: <br />"The City will perform an intensive review at least once every five years to ensure <br />the plan addresses changing needs and conditions." <br />Item No. 3. Staff is still reviewing the impacts of this proposed change. With the <br />proposed change the density ranges would be as follows: <br />Our initial review indicates that with the proposed change the City's overall net density <br />will drop below 3.0 units per acre. The 3.0 units per acres is the minimum density <br />required by Metropolitan Council and is not related to affordability but rather the <br />efficient use of regional infrastructure. Additionally, staff was informed by Metropolitan <br />Council that existing unsewered development, guided for future sewer service, would <br />also need to be included in the density calculations. This further reduces the overall net <br />density. <br />Staff is currently evaluating several options including adjusting the proposed density <br />ranges and the removal of several existing unsewered areas from Stage 1 /Stage 2 into the <br />Urban Reserve districts. Staff will have a proposed option available for review at the <br />meeting. <br />Item No. 4. The City Council would like to promote the distribution of affordable <br />housing in all residential districts. Staff is recommending the addition of a policy <br />statement to the Housing goals in Chapter 4 as follows: <br />"Establish requirements to provide for affordable housing in all residential land <br />use districts. <br />The implementation mechanism will be in the form of an ordinance, the drafting of which <br />will necessitate some lengthy conversations with the council. A number of issues will <br />need to be considered including but not limited to the following: <br />1. Does all residential development need to provide affordable housing? If so, how <br />much? <br />2. Is it only required to be affordable for the first owner or also subsequent owners? <br />3. What financial incentives will the City provide, if any? <br />2 <br />2008 Plan (proposed) <br />2002 Plan (recommended) <br />Low Density <br />1.5 <br />— 3.5 <br />1.0 <br />— 3.0 <br />Medium Density <br />3.6 <br />— 7.9 <br />3.0 <br />— 6.0 <br />High Density <br />8.0 <br />—15.0 <br />6.0 <br />— 12.0 <br />Our initial review indicates that with the proposed change the City's overall net density <br />will drop below 3.0 units per acre. The 3.0 units per acres is the minimum density <br />required by Metropolitan Council and is not related to affordability but rather the <br />efficient use of regional infrastructure. Additionally, staff was informed by Metropolitan <br />Council that existing unsewered development, guided for future sewer service, would <br />also need to be included in the density calculations. This further reduces the overall net <br />density. <br />Staff is currently evaluating several options including adjusting the proposed density <br />ranges and the removal of several existing unsewered areas from Stage 1 /Stage 2 into the <br />Urban Reserve districts. Staff will have a proposed option available for review at the <br />meeting. <br />Item No. 4. The City Council would like to promote the distribution of affordable <br />housing in all residential districts. Staff is recommending the addition of a policy <br />statement to the Housing goals in Chapter 4 as follows: <br />"Establish requirements to provide for affordable housing in all residential land <br />use districts. <br />The implementation mechanism will be in the form of an ordinance, the drafting of which <br />will necessitate some lengthy conversations with the council. A number of issues will <br />need to be considered including but not limited to the following: <br />1. Does all residential development need to provide affordable housing? If so, how <br />much? <br />2. Is it only required to be affordable for the first owner or also subsequent owners? <br />3. What financial incentives will the City provide, if any? <br />2 <br />