My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/09/2009 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2009
>
02/09/2009 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2014 2:27:48 PM
Creation date
5/19/2014 3:24:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
02/09/2009
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />DRAFT <br />CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION <br />DRAFT 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW <br />DATE <br />TIME STARTED <br />TIME ENDED <br />MEMBERS PRESENT <br />MEMBERS ABSENT <br />: January 12, 2009 <br />. 7:05 p.m. <br />. 7:45 p.m. <br />: Councilmember Gallup, O'Donnell, <br />Stoltz, Reinert and Mayor Bergeson <br />: None <br />Staff members present: Community Development Director, Michael Grochala; City <br />Administrator, Gordon Heitke. <br />Mayor Bergeson noted that the purpose of this special meeting is to continue review of <br />the Draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan (the Plan). He also noted that Community <br />Development Director Grochala was directed to meet with the Metropolitan Council and <br />put some numbers together for the council to review. The council would like to see <br />where there are differences and how far they run. <br />23 Community Development Director Grochala reported that staff did meet with the <br />24 Metropolitan Council staff the previous week. Regarding density, three units an acre is <br />25 not negotiable (they would like to see it even higher but will not go down on the number) <br />26 so staff is working on how those numbers can be calculated appropriately; they are not <br />27 including in calculations some areas that are to remain nnsewered. The end result of all <br />28 the calculations will be meeting the requirement (3.0) but there will be some recalculation <br />29 and rebuilding of equations involved. Staff is attempting to have maps indicating that <br />30 level available for the upcoming joint meeting with the Comprehensive Plan Advisory <br />31 Panel scheduled for January 21, 2009. Regarding the use of a density bonus element, <br />32 staff still intends to incorporate something into the ordinances. There is a list of elements <br />33 that would be included such as more open space or green building but the city should <br />34 attempt o keep as many things in the toolbox as an ordinance is put together. <br />35 Responding to a question about pace, staff pointed to the five year phasing plan that <br />36 includes a thorough review. Much control lies in phasing. <br />37 Staff will continue to update the Plan according to council direction. Community <br />38 Development Grochala noted that comments are coming in from other jurisdictions that <br />39 have reviewed the Plan. There have been some requests for changes in the Plan received <br />40 (individual property owners, etc) and staff intends to present those to the council. A <br />41 council member suggested that there should be a public hearing at the end of the review <br />42 process since the Plan has changed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.