My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/22/2009 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2009
>
06/22/2009 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2014 3:27:52 PM
Creation date
5/22/2014 12:28:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
06/22/2009
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES <br />DRAFT <br />June 8, 2009 <br />89 <br />90 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT, MICHAEL GROCHALA <br />91 Approval of 2030 <br />92 6A. Consideration of Resolution No. 09 -23, Preliminary pp <br />93 Comprehensive Plan for Submittal to Metropolitan Council <br />94 <br />95 Community Development Director Grochala explained that the draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan <br />96 (the Plan) has been through a lengthy process of consideration. State law requires cities within <br />97 the metro area to update and submit their Plan every ten years. The city's update process began <br />98 with a citizen survey in 2005, a visioning process completed in 2007 and establishment of a <br />99 citizen advisory group that reviewed and made recommendations on updating the Plan. The <br />100 process has involved several open houses at which input was sought and received from the <br />101 general public of the city. After public review and approval of the Planning and Zoning Board, <br />102 the council authorized distribution of the Plan to jurisdictions adjacent to the city for their <br />103 comment The council also met with the advisory panel and directed that an additional public <br />104 hearing be held by the Planning & Zoning Board to allow public consideration of the Plan as <br />105 revised. The Board recommended approval of the Plan and staff is now requesting council <br />106 authorization to submit the Plan to the Metropolitan Council The council held a special meeting <br />107 this past June 3 and gave several directions to revise the Plan. Those revisions (lowering the <br />108 growth forecast and making adjustments to elements of the Plan to reflect that change and further <br />109 research on how other communities are addressing housing affordability) have been <br />110 accomplished and are shown in the staff report Comments received from other jurisdictions are <br />111 also explained in the report. All revisions recommended by staff and requested by the council as <br />112 presented in the staff report were reviewed by Mr. Grochala and by Ciara Schlicting, Bonestroo <br />113 consultant to the project <br />114 <br />115 The mayor announced that the council would hear brief comments from the audience on the Plan <br />116 although this was not established as an official public hearing. <br />117 <br />118 Amy Donlin, 6100 Centerville Road, addressed the council. Ms. Donlin reported that she <br />119 brought up some uncomfortable questions about the Plan earlier in the evening at the council <br />120 work session. It is important for all citizens to do so — to speak your mind. She feels the city has <br />121 been using the process of conservation development in a way not intended when it was accepted <br />122 into the city's development process. The city has been using that process as a loophole to avert <br />123 the growth limitation and lure developers to subsidized projects. Furthermore, the number of <br />124 households the council is talking about in 30 years is too high and would be too dense for this <br />125 area_ People are watching and are concerned about what will happen to the quality of life in the <br />126 city. <br />127 <br />128 Terri O'Connell, 1000 Main Street, addressed the counciL She made a request to have her <br />129 property changed relative to how it will be guided by the Plan but she understands that her <br />130 request will not be granted.. She questions why the Plan seems to include little or no new <br />131 business development — only housing. That is a substantial difference from the city of Blaine <br />132 plan for instance. <br />133 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.