My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/22/2009 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2009
>
06/22/2009 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2014 3:27:52 PM
Creation date
5/22/2014 12:28:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
06/22/2009
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION June 1, 2009 <br />DRAFT <br />. i PINE STREET PAVING <br />2 <br />3 City Engineer Studenski recalled that, after receiving a petition from some Pine Street <br />4 residents requesting street paving, the council directed staff to investigate the matters of <br />5 how that street is currently maintained, how street construction could possibly be funded, <br />6 what a construction schedule would look like, and update a cost estimate from 2004. He <br />7 reported that the road is graded monthly and sprayed for dust control with costs basically <br />8 split between the city and the City of Columbus. Regarding funding, the road is not <br />9 designated for any state aid and unless a project would be 100% assessed to property <br />10 owners, it would require referendum approval. He presented two cost estimates, for a <br />11 project extending from Lake Drive to the end of Pine Street and for a project from Lake <br />12 Drive to 4th Avenue only. Costs would be split equally between Lino Lakes and <br />13 Columbus residents. He reviewed a possible schedule based on a scenario of one- <br />14 hundred percent assessment. <br />15 <br />16 The council and Mr. Studenski discussed how assessments would be considered (by <br />17 property, not by footage). Lots that could possibly be subdivided would be assessed <br />18 based on that potential. The council asked if the Columbus side of the street is firmly <br />19 committed to the project and will the level of interest on the Lino Lakes' side remain the <br />20 same when the cost is presented? <br />21 <br />• 22 <br />23 A resident in the audience suggested that the last time the suggestion of street <br />improvement was considered, the matter became so confused that people were reluctant <br />24 to sign on. The council concurred that providing adequate and clear information to the <br />25 residents is important. <br />26 <br />27 A resident suggested that the issue may be just that the grading and regular maintenance <br />28 work isn't done properly. <br />29 <br />30 A council member suggested that the project remain on a dual track to look at both a <br />31 project only to 4th Avenue as well as one for the entire street, so the project doesn't die if <br />32 the whole thing isn't viable. <br />33 <br />34 Staff was directed to work with the neighborhood in putting together a letter with a cost <br />35 estimate and other information to be sent out by the city to all property owners. <br />36 <br />37 The meeting was adjourned at 7:35 p.m. <br />38 <br />39 These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on <br />40 June22, 2009. <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />45 Julianne Bartell, City Clerk John Bergeson, Mayor <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.