Laserfiche WebLink
Xcel Energy Variance, page 4 <br />c. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone if reasonable <br />use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. <br />Economic considerations are not a major factor in this proposal, the <br />intent is to minimize the applicant's holdings and center an easement <br />directly over the existing transmission lines. <br />d. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any <br />special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, <br />structures, or buildings in the same district. <br />There are very few other situations that can be compared to this one. <br />Land locked parcels owned and operated almost exclusively for utility <br />purposes would receive the same consideration. <br />e. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br />ordinance. <br />Combining these properties with the adjacent landowner's parcels will <br />in no way violate the spirit and intent of the zoning ordinance. <br />NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes <br />hereby approves the variances for lot area, lot width and road frontage. <br />BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the variances are subject to the following <br />conditions: <br />1. The properties must be divided through the minor subdivision process. <br />2. When ownership of these properties changes hands the new owner(s) are <br />required to combine them with adjacent parcels to avoid creating a new parcel. <br />John J. Bergeson, Mayor <br />ATTEST: <br />Julie Bartell, City Clerk <br />Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 27th day of July, 2009. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council <br />Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor <br />thereof: <br />The following voted against same: <br />Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />• <br />