Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES July 27, 2009 <br />DRAFT <br />Ill181 day waiting period following the public hearing applies to the charter governed area only. He <br />182 intends to continue discussions with property owners during the waiting period as well as <br />183 continue negotiations with Anoka County (including discussion about assessment rates). There <br />184 will be other agreements involved with the project such as for signals It is certain that more <br />185 answers about the project, including funding, will evolve as things move forward. <br />186 <br />187 A council member stated that the council has heard questions about the fairness in the amount of <br />188 assessment and they are valid. It is anticipated that staff will continue evaluating the proposed <br />189 assessments and will work with those who would be impacted by them. The question of the <br />190 rate of interest that would be charged on deferred assessments is important and the city must do <br />191 what it can to make that consideration clear. Another concern is that the council is being asked <br />192 to be a part of this project before many of the elements are clear. Staff again outlined the <br />193 process involving a county road project. It was clarified that a key funding element of the <br />194 project, namely stimulus money, will not be available after November 15 of this year. <br />195 <br />196 6C. Consideration of Resolution No. 09-48, Approving 2009/2010 Foxborough <br />197 Management Plan <br />198 <br />199 Environmental Coordinator Asleson reported on the proposed 2009/2010 schedule of work <br />200 related to the Foxborough development conservation area. A plan has been put forward by the <br />201 ecologist hired by the Foxborough Association and the city's Environmental Board has <br />•202 approved the plans. <br />203 <br />204 Council Member Stoltz moved to approve Resolution No. 09-48 as presented. Council Member <br />205 Gallup seconded the motion. Motion carried. <br />206 <br />207 613. First reading of Ordinance No. 04-09, Amending Zoning Ordinance to Allow <br />208 Public, Educational, and Religious Buildings as Conditional Uses in General <br />209 Business and Limited Business Zoning Districts, and Amending City Code so that <br />210 Separation Distance for Liquor License shall not apply if School or Church is in <br />211 Limited Business or General Business Zoning District <br />212 <br />213 City Planner Smyser reported that the item before the council is first reading of an ordinance <br />214 amending the zoning code to allow public, educational and religious buildings as conditional <br />215 uses in general business and limited business zoning districts in the city, and amending the <br />216 liquor code so that separation distance for liquor licenses shall not apply for a school or church <br />217 in said zoning districts. The city has received an application from a church wishing to acquire <br />218 the former VFW site (in a business district). Staff has reviewed uses allowed in business <br />219 districts. In consideration that similar uses should be allowed within established zoning <br />220 districts, Mr. Smyser pointed out similarities between the private lodge/club use of the VFW <br />221 (that use is currently allowed in business district as a conditional use) and the possible church <br />222 use (that use is not currently allowed in business district). Mr. Smyser then explained a federal <br />223 law prohibiting discrimination against churches (for land use) and pointed out that there have <br />411 224 been court cases that have found appropriate church uses similar to lodge/club use. He also <br />225 pointed out the current standards/conditions that apply to all conditional uses in the city as well <br />