My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/08/2009 Council Packet (2)
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2009
>
09/08/2009 Council Packet (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2014 10:37:53 AM
Creation date
5/27/2014 8:40:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
09/08/2009
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MARTY LAW FIRM, LLC <br />3601 Minnesota Drive <br />Suite 800 <br />Bloomington, MN 55435 <br />June 1, 2009 <br />Caroline Dahl <br />Chair, Lino Lakes Charter Commission <br />600 Town Center Parkway <br />Lino Lakes, MN 55014 <br />Dear Ms. Dahl: <br />Telephone: 952 -921 -5859 <br />e -mail: kmarty @ix.netcom.com <br />Fax: 651- 294 -1026 <br />Thank you for the opportunity to review the opinion rendered by Mr. Michael G. <br />Dougherty, regarding an audit he performed of the Charter Commission expenditures. He <br />concludes that the Lino Lakes Charter Commission has only those powers granted by statute, no <br />"inherent" powers, and that the Charter Commission apparently overstepped its limitations when <br />it expended funds encouraging citizens to retain the current charter rather than repeal one portion <br />of it. In support of his conclusions, he cites no case law other than a district court decision <br />(which is neither published nor binding on any other judge or court), and opinions by two state <br />departments, which likewise are not binding on any court. <br />Regarding the suggestion that the Charter Commission is limited to the powers granted by <br />statute, Mr. Dougherty is only partially correct. A charter commission has both the powers <br />granted by statute, and also those which " are implied as necessary in aid of those powers" <br />expressly granted by statute. Welsh v. City of Orono, 355 N.W.2d 117, 120 (Minn. 1984). In <br />Welsh, the court was discussing the power of a statutory city, but the point remains the same: an <br />entity created under statute has the powers necessary to accomplish its work as specified in the <br />statutes. <br />Mr. Dougherty relied upon decisions relating to the City of Eagan's failed attempts to <br />adopt a charter. Eagan was and is a statutory city, without the powers of a home rule charter city. <br />Its charter commission had only one goal: the adoption of a charter. That failed, and the charter <br />commission had no other purpose for existence. Lino Lakes successfully adopted a charter in <br />1982. Once a city adopts a charter, it has much broader authority than a statutory city. Nothing <br />says the city may not empower its charter commission to do matters beyond those specified in <br />state law. See Lino Lakes Charter Section 1.02. <br />Statutory cities have only the power granted to them by the legislature. Charter cities <br />have all the power of the state legislature, except where the legislature has withheld that power. <br />Put another way, the legislature has told statutory cities "you can do only those things I say you <br />can do." The legislature has told charter cities "you can do anything you want, except for those <br />things I say you cannot do." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.