My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/08/2009 Council Packet (2)
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2009
>
09/08/2009 Council Packet (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2014 10:37:53 AM
Creation date
5/27/2014 8:40:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
09/08/2009
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Staff Reductions: <br />Building Inspections 1.5 FTE $106,220 <br />Administration 1.0 FTE 53,940 <br />Community Devel. 0.5 FTE 26,970 <br />Finance/Utilities 0.5 FTE 27,260 <br />Police 0.5 FTE 26,909 <br />Streets/Parks 1.0 FTE Included in Budget <br />Discontinue JPA w/ Centennial Schools 50,000 <br />Renegotiate w/ Police unions 60,000 <br />Reduce Engineering 35,000 <br />Furloughs — 2 weeks Staff, 3 weeks Directors 211,500 <br />Total Adjustments <br />Total Adjustments needed to Balance <br />Adjustments over needed to Balance <br />Non -Public Safety Staffing Levels Reduced to Pre -2000 <br />$597,799 <br />554,623 <br />$ 43,176 <br />Cutting 5 FTE staff positions will cause adjustments to be made in most service delivery <br />areas, requiring the cross training of personnel to allow for staff backup at minimal <br />levels. Should the retirement incentive plan approved by the City Council prove to be <br />effective, it may have an effect on the number of positions proposed to be reduced and on <br />the cost of the reductions, i.e. unemployment payments. <br />While the level of adjustments is about $43,000 more than required, it must be noted that <br />some use of fund balance is required to balance the budget. If the use of fund balance to <br />balance the budget is not acceptable, additional staff reductions would be necessary. In <br />addition, we note that the budget includes no contingency. Should there be any need for <br />additional unforeseen spending in 2010 it is assumed that the Council would use fund <br />balance as a last resort to fund these needs. <br />Possible Effects on Centennial Fire District <br />It was also suggested that the possibility of reducing or eliminating Centennial Fire <br />District capital contribution would save the city up to $69,600 in 2010. While this <br />amount is not included in the city's budget, it would reduce the necessary debt issuance <br />needed to purchase capital equipment, and reduce the burden on future levies. A <br />renegotiation of the contribution formula in the JPA may be to the city's advantage in <br />future years. <br />Future Impacts <br />It should be noted that while the City Council may feel the need to hold level or reduce <br />the city's tax rate in troubled economic times, the cost of doing so will certainly have an <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.