My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/08/2009 Council Packet (2)
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2009
>
09/08/2009 Council Packet (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2014 10:37:53 AM
Creation date
5/27/2014 8:40:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
09/08/2009
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WS — Item 7 <br />WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT <br />Work Session Item 7 <br />Date: Council Work Session, September 8, 2009 <br />To: City Council <br />From: Michael Grochala <br />Re: 35E /CSAH 14 Interchange Funding <br />Background <br />As directed at the August 3, 2009 council work session staff has continued to work with <br />Anoka County on the interchange improvement funding. Since that meeting Anoka <br />County has been informed of an additional $2 million dollars being provided by Mn/DOT <br />from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). Attached to this report is a <br />draft Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) which provides the structure for the city's cost share <br />participation. As currently proposed the city's share of the project is estimated at <br />$4,221,000. This is approximately a $1.3 million reduction from what was discussed in <br />August. Anoka County's share of the estimated $22 million project is $3,017,334. <br />As noted in the agreement the city share of construction and land acquisition, after <br />application of federal and state funds, will be 60% and the county 40 %. Any cost <br />overruns or underruns will be based on this same percentage. Additionally, any <br />additional funding received would be applied consistent with this formula. <br />While reduction in the city's share of costs is extremely helpful, financing the <br />improvement continues to be the largest impediment. Nearly 80% of the proposed <br />assessment amount is expected to by deferred because the land falls into one of the <br />following categories: 1) green acres; 2) senior citizen; or 3) unplatted /undeveloped land. <br />This severely limits the revenue stream necessary to fund any debt issued for the project. <br />As a result staff has requested that Anoka County carry the debt on the project with no <br />limitation on the timeline for city payment of our obligation. Based on our recent <br />discussions it does not appear the county is in a position to accommodate this request. As <br />noted in the JPA under section III.F.5 the county is proposing the carry the debt for 5 <br />years with the city responsible for interest and service charges accrued to that date. <br />To accommodate this funding scenario the city would need to identify a interim revenue <br />stream to meet the debt obligations until assessment revenue is received. Springsted Inc., <br />the city's financial consultant, is evaluating the availability of our state aid street <br />revenues as an interim financing source. In absence of an interim financing source and <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.