My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/28/2009 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2009
>
09/28/2009 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2014 10:47:26 AM
Creation date
5/27/2014 10:16:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
09/28/2009
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SPECIALCOUNCIL MEETING September 8, 2009 <br />DRAFT <br />1 citizens the opportunity to see how the council discusses and reaches its decisions for the <br />2 city. <br />3 <br />4 Mayor Bergeson opened the public hearing. <br />5 <br />6 Paul Tralle, 945 Evergreen Trail, supports the amendment adding that he would like to <br />7 see all the city's government groups, including the charter commission, be added to the <br />8 requirement (to be televised). <br />9 <br />10 Pat Smith, 6922 West Shadow Lake Drive, stated that he is a former charter commission <br />11 chair person and he agrees with the concept of televising the charter commission <br />12 meetings so the public can view their activities as well. <br />13 <br />14 There being no one else wishing to speak, Council Member O'Donnell moved to close <br />15 the public hearing. Council Member Reinert seconded the motion. Motion was adopted. <br />16 <br />17 Council Member Reinert moved to approve first reading of the charter amendment <br />18 ordinance The motion was seconded_ <br />19 <br />20 The council asked for more information on the attorney's work to clarify the amendment <br />21 language <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 The city attorney stated that he is unaware as to whether or not open mike is included in <br />41 the city code as part of the regular meeting. If in fact it is, it would be unnecessary to <br />42 include that designation. The amendment could simply read "all council meetings will be <br />43 televised ". <br />44 <br />City Attorney Langel explained that he identified some language in the amendment (as <br />proposed by the commission) to be unnecessary or inaccurate. For example the <br />amendment identifies all "open" council meetings but all council meetings are open so <br />there is no need for that word. Additionally council work sessions are identified but <br />council work sessions are regular council meetings so they would be covered without <br />being specifically identified. Also the open mike portion wouldn't be included unless it <br />is a part of the meeting. He prepared language that he feels is clearer but it was rejected <br />by the commission. <br />Commissioner Sutherland explained that the city code calls for the open mike portion to <br />be a part of the meeting and the commission feels it is important to identify that portion in <br />particular. The commission feels the language is clear and appropriate in that the charter <br />itself is written in "working man's language ". They would like a guarantee, through the <br />charter, that the open mike portion will remain televised. In addition she explained that <br />the commission has discussed televising their meetings but she cannot speak on behalf of <br />the commission in approving any changes. <br />—40- 2 <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.