My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03/14/2001 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
03/14/2001 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/30/2014 3:43:24 PM
Creation date
5/30/2014 12:12:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
03/14/2001
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />February 13, 2001 <br />Page 6 <br />put their store on. However, she was concerned about the access off of 77th Street to the <br />Target Store. She stated Target Corporation had indicated the City wanted the access. <br />She indicated she did not want access off of 77th Street into Target. Mr. Powell <br />responded the City wanted some sort of a connection from 77th Street to Target Store; not <br />from Target Store to 77th Street. He stated they originally had discussions for an access <br />for emergency vehicles only, not for traffic to go from Apollo Drive to 77th Street. He <br />stated the way the development was proposed, they were looking at Target Corporation's <br />proposal for another access, but the Target Corporation was still revising their plans and <br />nothing had been decided on. <br />Mr. Corson made a MOTION to continue the public hearing until such time as the EAW <br />process was completed and wetland fill and mitigation plans were approved by Rice <br />Creek, and was supported by Ms. Lane. Motion carried 5 -0. <br />C. PUBLIC HEARING, Land Holding Group, 12th & Holly, Preliminary Plat <br />Chair Schaps declared the public hearing opened at 7:14 <br />Staff presented the application by Land Hold Group r a preliminary plat for the <br />northwest corner of 12th Avenue and Holly Driv <br />6 <br />Staff presented its analysis of the request, nwting the site was zoned for residential <br />development. The site was within the exist n_ ` USA, and all of the lots met or exceeded <br />the minimum lot size. The propose . • t widths were compliant with the minimum <br />r lots <br />standard of a width of 90 feet for <br />lot depth was 135 feet. All of t e <br />had a depth of 127 feet, w <br />consider the site was i <br />collector roads thereby lira <br />stated applicant had not subm <br />considered. The grading of the site must accommodate the housing styles. Staff <br />indicated an existing shed and pole building were located within the new street right -of- <br />way and must be removed. Utilities existed on both 12th and Holly, and an extension of <br />utilities down the proposed cul -de -sac was proposed. The water main needed to be <br />looped to 12th Street. The utilities plan was subject to City Engineer review and approval. <br />The number of lots fronting 12th Avenue had been reduced from five lots in the concept <br />plan to one lot in the preliminary plat. The number of lots fronting on Holly Drive had <br />increased from zero to one. The rest of the lots were proposed to front a new cul -de -sac <br />street. Based on modifications to the plan, which reduced the number of accesses, staff <br />approved the layout. <br />d 115 feet for corner lots. The minimum <br />Lot 8, complied with this standard. Lot 8 <br />variance. The Planning Commission could <br />nds and it was located at the intersection of two <br />gn options as a basis for granting the variance. Staff <br />information about what house styles were being <br />Staff indicated a trail was envisioned along Holly Drive, but had not been designed yet. It <br />had not been decided whether the trail would be on the north or south side of Holly. It <br />would be within the road right -of -way. Park dedication for this new development would <br />be cash. Although boundaries of wetlands were shown on the preliminary plat, a wetland <br />delineation report would need to be submitted. Wetland review should determine if the <br />filling of the created pond that was proposed to be built in the southwest portion of the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.