Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />* Land areas are approximate so totals do not match. <br />The proposed development is consistent with the proposed land use but is not consistent with the <br />anticipated areas allocated to each use. <br />Surrounding Land Uses: <br />Acres on Draft <br />Land Use Plan <br />Application <br />Low Density Sewered <br />24 <br />16 <br />Medium Density Residential <br />2.5 <br />13 <br />Commercial <br />15.5 <br />7 <br />Right -of -Way <br />Urban residential <br />5 <br />TOTAL <br />42* <br />41* <br />* Land areas are approximate so totals do not match. <br />The proposed development is consistent with the proposed land use but is not consistent with the <br />anticipated areas allocated to each use. <br />Surrounding Land Uses: <br />411 Shoreland Management Overlay District: All areas within 1,000 feet of the ordinary high <br />water level (OHWL) are subject to the Shoreland Management Regulations. Nearly all of this <br />development falls within the Shoreland Overlay, as determined by the OHW of Rice Lake, a <br />Natural Environment Lake. Because there is public land between the proposed lots and the <br />OHW, none of the lots are considered abutting and thus, the regulations aren't as restrictive. <br />However, there is a 150 foot setback requirement from the OHW for all structures. This creates <br />an issue for Lots 12 -16 and Lots 25 and 26. There is not adequate space to meet the setbacks and <br />accommodate a reasonable house pad. <br />An analysis of density as it relates to the Shoreland Ordinance needs to be provided by the <br />applicant. This exercise identifies the density as it relates to the suitable land area and is required <br />under the PDO. <br />Greenway: The draft Comprehensive Plan identifies areas for greenways. The greenway areas <br />adjacent to this property are currently public land and thus are already protected. In addition, the <br />wetland areas will be encumbered by a drainage and utility easement. <br />Environmental Board Review: The Environmental Board reviewed the application and their <br />comments are attached. The comments submitted by the Board related to curbing are in conflict <br />with the Zoning and Subdivision Regulations. <br />2 <br />Comprehensive Plan <br />Existing <br />Comprehensive Plan <br />Proposed <br />Existing <br />Zoning <br />Site <br />Rural <br />Low /Medium Density <br />and Commercial <br />R -1 <br />North <br />Public open space <br />Public open space <br />Public <br />East <br />Urban residential <br />Low /medium density <br />R -1 <br />South <br />Multiple family <br />Commercial <br />R -3 <br />West <br />Public open space <br />Public open space <br />Public <br />411 Shoreland Management Overlay District: All areas within 1,000 feet of the ordinary high <br />water level (OHWL) are subject to the Shoreland Management Regulations. Nearly all of this <br />development falls within the Shoreland Overlay, as determined by the OHW of Rice Lake, a <br />Natural Environment Lake. Because there is public land between the proposed lots and the <br />OHW, none of the lots are considered abutting and thus, the regulations aren't as restrictive. <br />However, there is a 150 foot setback requirement from the OHW for all structures. This creates <br />an issue for Lots 12 -16 and Lots 25 and 26. There is not adequate space to meet the setbacks and <br />accommodate a reasonable house pad. <br />An analysis of density as it relates to the Shoreland Ordinance needs to be provided by the <br />applicant. This exercise identifies the density as it relates to the suitable land area and is required <br />under the PDO. <br />Greenway: The draft Comprehensive Plan identifies areas for greenways. The greenway areas <br />adjacent to this property are currently public land and thus are already protected. In addition, the <br />wetland areas will be encumbered by a drainage and utility easement. <br />Environmental Board Review: The Environmental Board reviewed the application and their <br />comments are attached. The comments submitted by the Board related to curbing are in conflict <br />with the Zoning and Subdivision Regulations. <br />2 <br />