My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/11/2001 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
04/11/2001 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2014 4:48:26 PM
Creation date
5/30/2014 1:25:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
04/11/2001
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Wetland mitigation needed <br />• Infiltration basins indicated <br />Implied Trail through a proposed greenway area(1992 -2001) <br />STAFF COMMENTS /ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION: <br />1 Good idea to ask for a conservation easement with signage in the area <br />directly east and west of the lake. Signage should be posted along <br />edge reminding I no mow /disturb) For this to work, there needs to be <br />covenants restricting use and providing for a management agency. A <br />minimum association fee should be set aside for management of this <br />area. A management plan should be developed. The management agency <br />should be the local environmental review board. <br />1 A Tree preservation plan has been submitted. A site visit and a bit <br />more detail may be needed. <br />1 .Shoreland Overlay district means that on a sewered lot, building <br />setback must be 150 feet from the ordinary high water level. This <br />needs to be verified. <br />• City Engineering has shown concern for the house pad elevations. Soil <br />may need to be imported to raise the pad elevations. Mr. Goerts has <br />indicated to me that they will need to fill only on two lots if a lift <br />pump can be installed near NE cul de sac <br />1 .,. The trail proposal through the planned greenway area (conservation <br />easement area) may have physical barriers at the area circled in red on <br />the enclosed GIS map. The county has indicated that they have abandoned <br />this idea. <br />• Ilnfiltration areas are indicated on the North end, and a I Treed) <br />swale overflow on the south central side will be preserved. <br />COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REFERENCES: <br />ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD COMMENTS: The following is a summary of the comments <br />made by the March 28, 2001 Environmental Board: <br />Recommendations include all of the staff recommendations listed above in <br />project trac report to The Environmental Board on March 28th, and in <br />addition the Environmental Board made the following recommendations: <br />• Those cul de sacs proposed by the developer to be devoid of curbing are <br />allowed with surface water trained into retention swails along side of <br />the road. <br />• That the angle of the townhomes as positioned on the plan be opened up <br />if possible in the area between the water /tree swaile area on the south <br />side of the townhome area. <br />• That the Environmental Board advises that this is a High Ecological <br />Value Zone based on the City Environmental Inventory, and that wetland <br />0 should be buffered as much as possible. <br />17apico_ &_Pe %psarlov_Boap8 Xirt_o0 Aivo Aaresa <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.