06/13/2001 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• • • Planning & Zoning Board May 9, 2001 Page 2 V. ACTION ITEMS A. John Cartier, 2088 80th Street E., Variance Staff presented the application by explaining the applicant, Mr. Cartier, has submitted an application for a variance from the prohibition on building an accessory building closer to the front lot line than the principal building. Staff presented its analysis of the request by explaining the City's zoning ordinance states that "no detached accessory structure shall be closer to the front lot line than the principal building or its attached garage (Section 3 Subd. 4.D.1.c.)." The existing house is toward the southwest corner of the property and the septic system is to the southwest of the house. Considering the need for an alternate drainfield site, there is little land left for an accessory building. It was noted that the land to the southeast of the house is lowland and unbuildable. Staff noted the aerial photo does show an area that appears to be a pocket pond, possibly wetland. The area noted as "drainage" on the drawing corresponds to a type of soil with seasonally high water table, according tothe County soil survey prepared by the Soil Conservation Service. Staff noted it is possible that the accessory buil g could be built in the far southeast corner of the site, but that would require driving .gh the wet area to reach it from the house. Mr. Cartier wants to build a 40' b .0' or 40 70' accessory building. This site is approximately ten acres so the applicant otal of 4,200 square feet of accessory space, including the attached gara The garage is approximately 868 square feet, which leaves 3,332 square feet 40' b 0' building would be 2,800 square feet. Staff read the five findings /it= as stated in the zoning ordinance, that the City shall make in considering all uests f' variance in taking subsequent action. Staff noted it would be unrea .'.le to require a driveway through the wet area to reach the far southeast corner of the property. The landowner's intent to use the new building for an agriculture use fits with the purpose of the Rural zoning district. Staff recommends approving the variance conditioned on a building permit being obtained before construction of the accessory building begins. Chair Schaps invited the applicant to make comment. John Cartier, applicant, stated he has nothing to add to the staff report and would appreciate approval of his variance request since there is no other location that would work. Chair Schaps asked if any of the neighbors have raised objections. Mr. Cartier stated there have been no objections. Mr. Corson asked the intended use. Mr. Cartier stated he has ten acres but has access to additional family -owned property and would like to use the building to park his equipment inside.