My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/11/2001 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
07/11/2001 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2014 11:05:27 AM
Creation date
6/3/2014 10:38:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
07/11/2001
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />June 13, 2001 <br />Page 9 <br />• E. PUBLIC HEARING, Centennial School District, Birch St. Site, Rezone <br />Chair Schaps declared the public hearing for both Item E and Item F opened at 8:00 p.m. <br />Staff presented the application by explaining that ISD 12 requested to locate a new elementary <br />school next to the Centennial Middle School, the School District also hoped to sell its existing <br />vacant property along Birch Street. In this regard, the School District had requested that their <br />38.29 -acre site be rezoned from PSP, Public /Semi - Public District to R -1X, Single Family <br />Executive District. <br />Staff presented its analysis of the request, noting the following: <br />Staff explained ISD 12, in evaluating its elementary school needs, determined that a new facility <br />adjoining the existing middle school would best serve its current and future enrollment <br />population. The Birch Street site was seen as a duplicate site for Rice Lake Elementary School <br />and Centerville Elementary School. <br />Staff stated the 38.29 acre site was zoned PSP, Public /Semi - Public Zoning District. This zoning <br />district was limited in the range of uses that were allowed. To market the property for sale, this <br />range of use was very limiting and in some cases the uses may not be conducive or compatible <br />with the adjoining residential properties (i.e., clinics, nursing homes, public buildings, hospitals). <br />111 Staff explained the applicant was proposing to rezone the property to R -1X, Single Family <br />Executive District. This was a low- density urban residential district. <br />Staff indicated in consideration of rezoning requests, the possible adverse effects of the <br />amendment should be considered. Generally speaking, the City Council and Planning <br />Commission's judgment of the rezoning should be based upon, but not limited to, the following <br />factors: <br />1. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provision of the official <br />City Comprehensive Plan. <br />2. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area. <br />3. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained herein (i.e., <br />parking, loading, noise, etc.). <br />4. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, <br />schools, streets, and utilities, and its potential to overburden the City's service capacity. <br />5. Traffic generation of the proposed use in relation to capabilities of streets serving the <br />property. <br />Staff stated while zoned PSP, the 1990 Land Use Plan guides the subject site for single family <br />residential and includes the area in the existing MUSA. The Proposed 2020 Land Use Plan <br />showed the property as public /semi - public, reflecting the public ownership and current zoning. <br />The 2020 plan also included the site in the MUSA and Phase 1 growth area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.