Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />Fence Variance: The second variance involves a proposed fence around the back <br />yard and pool. The Ramsay's lot fronts on Ruffed Grouse Court. Their rear lot line is the <br />side lot line of their neighbors' house, which fronts on Ruffed Grouse Road. The zoning <br />ordinance addresses fences in such a situation, which is common with corner lots: <br />Should the rear lot line of a lot be common with the side lot line of an abutting lot, <br />that portion of the rear lot line equate to the required front yard of the abutting lot <br />shall not be fenced to a height of more than four (4) feet. (Section 3 Subd. 4.T.b.) <br />The ordinance is verbally clumsy: substitute "equal" for "equate ". In addition, our <br />interpretation has always been that the intent is: "that portion of the rear yard equal to <br />the required front yard of the abutting lot shall not be fenced to height more than four <br />feet." The intent is to prevent a front yard from being closed in by a neighbor's six -foot <br />fence along that neighbor's back and side yards. It is instructive that a later passage <br />states: <br />Fences in residential districts may be located in any yard to a height of four (4) <br />feet, except that a fence up to six (6) feet in height may be erected from the front <br />facade of the principal building to the side and/or rear lot line. <br />(Section 3 Subd. 4.T.4.) <br />Clearly, the intent is to keep front yards visually open, free from six -foot fences. The <br />fence along the side lot lines can go up to six feet beginning at the building front and <br />going back from there — except when the lot abuts another where the taller fence would <br />fence in the abutting lot's front yard. <br />The ordinance regarding pools requires only a four -foot fence if a fence is the safeguard <br />to prevent children from gaining uncontrolled access. In fact, because the ladder to the <br />pool can beretracted, the ordinance does not actually require a fence. The Ramsays are <br />concerned about children climbing a four -foot fence and gaining unsupervised access to <br />the pool. <br />Staff was unable to contact the neighbors on the abutting lot due to their phone number <br />being unlisted. <br />The Ramsays have said they are amenable to constructing the six -foot fence as far back <br />from the road as possible while still enclosing the pool. <br />Findings for Variance <br />In considering all requests for variance and in taking subsequent action, the City shall <br />make a finding of fact: <br />• 1. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under <br />conditions allowed by the official controls. <br />