Laserfiche WebLink
As part of the audit, we proposed the following entries: <br />- Reclassify bond proceeds in the Water Fund. <br />Reclassify refunding debt service expenditures. <br />Adjust accrued interest payable in the Water Fund. <br />To record a delinquent special assessment receivable and offsetting deferred revenue. <br />To reclassify new bond issue costs and record 2006 amortization of bond issue costs in the <br />Water Fund. <br />To adjust net assets classification, Invested in Capital Assets Net of Related Debt in the <br />business -type funds. <br />The above entries relate to internal controls over the year -end close -out process. The absence of a <br />complete control procedure or process in this area is considered a material weakness because the <br />potential exists that a material misstatement of the financial statements could occur and not be <br />prevented or detected by the Citys intemal control processes. <br />During the course of our audit, several items came to our attention that we feel could be addressed by <br />the City of Lino Lakes to more efficiently run the City's operations or improve its intemal controls. We <br />herein submit the following suggestions to the City of Lino Lakes for their consideration. <br />Auditor Comments: <br />Capital Proiect Deficits <br />The financial statements for the capital project funds are presented in Statements 3, 5, 12 and 13 of the <br />2006 Annual Financial Report. As of December 31, 2006, three of the capital project funds have deficit <br />fund balances equaling a combined deficit of $783,556. This compares to five capital project funds with <br />a combined deficit fund balance of $859,840 as of December 31, 2005. We would like to recognize the <br />significant improvements made related to fund balance deficits over the past three years. Of the three <br />remaining funds with a deficit, one is very typical for any city operating a TIF fund (TIF 1 -11), one is <br />simply a timing difference between expenditures and the related MSA funding source (CSAG 14/8 <br />Reconstruction Project), and the last has specifically been addressed by the Council and a plan is being <br />implemented to reduce the deficit over the near future (Dedicated Parks). <br />SAC Revolvin <br />The SAC Revolving Fund was established in 1990 to account for a refund from the MCES (formerly <br />MWCC) of past SAC charges which were paid by residents that had not hooked up to the sewer <br />system. <br />A summary of financial activity of this fund is as follows: <br />Revenue <br />SAC refund <br />Investment earnings <br />Total revenue <br />Expenditures: <br />Refunds <br />Prior <br />Years 2006 Total <br />$ 368,816 $ $ 368,816 <br />263,155 15,657 278,812 <br />631,971 15,657 647,628 <br />$ 259,994 $ 334,244 594,238 <br />Fund balance - December 31, 2006 $ 53,390 <br />(8) <br />