Laserfiche WebLink
The diverse nature of the type of debt included in the same fund type requires careful analysis to <br />determine the adequacy of the fund balance and projected fund balance. The following schedule <br />extracts information from Exhibits 2 and 3 of the 2006 Annual Financial Report to assist in this analysis. <br />The following schedule compares outstanding debt with assets pledged for debt retirement. This <br />comparison provides a means to judge (at least on a preliminary basis) the financial position of each <br />individual debt service fund. <br />December 31, 2006 Deferred Total Remaining Over <br />Fund Deferred Tax Resources Debt Service (Under) <br />Fund Description Balance Revenue Total Levies Available Scheduled Funded <br />General Debt: <br />Certificates of Indebtedness <br />Lease Revenue Bonds of 1998A <br />Public Project Revenue Bonds 1999C <br />Tax Abatement Bonds 2006C <br />Utility Revenue Bonds 2006D <br />CIP Refunding Bonds 2006E <br />Special Assessment Debt: <br />Improvement Bonds of 2002A <br />Improvement Bonds of 2002B <br />Improvement Bonds of 2003A <br />Improvement Bonds of 20038 <br />Improvement Bonds of 2004A <br />Improvement Bonds of 2005A <br />Refunding Imp. Bonds of 2005B <br />$ 99,567 $ 4,681 $ 104,248 $ 552,798 $ 657,046 $ 526,474 $ 130,572 <br />429,172 5,424 434,596 495,057 929,653 942,093 (12,440) <br />342,770 2,062 344,832 334,079 678,911 422,689 256,222 <br />70,926 70,926 3,826,438 3,897,364 3,712,810 184,554 <br />51,608 141,334 192,942 192,942 716,286 (523,344) <br />50,549 50,549 4,094,370 4,144,919 3,929,300 215,619 <br />$ 1,044,592 $ 153,501 $ 1,198,093 $ 9,302,742 $ 10,500,835 $ 10,249,652 $ 251,183 <br />$ 434,031 $ 111,656 <br />1,162,501 543,741 <br />29,734 241,834 <br />97,665 46,936 <br />303,496 374,909 <br />585,551 5,117,834 <br />335,382 385,560 <br />$ 2,948,360 $ 6,822,470 $ <br />$ 545,687 $ 42,698 $ <br />1,706,242 - <br />271,568 <br />144,601 174,417 <br />678,405 1,766,686 <br />5,703,385 7,987,338 <br />720,942 4,253,617 <br />588,385 <br />1,706,242 <br />271,568 <br />319,018 <br />2,445,091 <br />13,690,723 <br />4,974,559 <br />$ 387,334 $ 201,051 <br />1,891,316 (185,074) <br />1,439,384 (1,167,816) <br />275,077 43,941 <br />1,633,469 811,622 <br />7,940,409 5,750,314 <br />4,514,408 460,151 <br />9,770,830 $ 14,224,756 $ 23,995,586 $ 18,081,397 $ 5,914,189 <br />Note: Deferred revenue in the above table does not include the future scheduled "interest portion" of the <br />adopted assessment rolls. The 2004A Improvement Bonds also include a pledge from the Area and <br />Unit Fund that has not been included above. <br />The above table provides a means for the monitoring the status of the debt service funds. For the <br />General Debt funded solely by property taxes, it appears that there are adequate planned levies to retire <br />the debt when the future lease revenues scheduled to be received from the school district are included. <br />While in total the City has a surplus of total resources available over remaining scheduled debt service <br />based on the calculation above, certain individual funds are operating at a deficit. These deficits will <br />need to be funded by future adopted assessment rolls, special assessment levies, investment earnings, <br />transfers from other funds, property taxes or other available means. <br />Factors to consider when analyzing debt service funds: <br />• Are all the anticipated assessment rolls being adopted as soon as appropriate? <br />• Have all the planned financing sources been identified, such as pledged amounts from the area and <br />unit fund or future MSA funds? <br />• Are there significant "prepayments" received from property owners? In the current investment <br />environment, will the earnings the City will receive on these prepayments be lower than the interest <br />rate that was being charged on the adopted assessment roll? <br />The Area & Unit Fund is committed to the debt service of some special assessment bonds as well as <br />toward the water revenue bonds. The City's five -year operating plan addresses the above issues and <br />therefore, this comment is simplya reminder of the extent that repayment of certain debt is based on <br />pledged sources from the Area and Unit fund. <br />(10) <br />