My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08/08/2001 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
08/08/2001 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/4/2014 3:47:55 PM
Creation date
6/3/2014 12:20:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
08/08/2001
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />1. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under <br />conditions allowed by the official controls. <br />2. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his <br />property not created by the land owner. <br />3. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone and when a reasonable <br />use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. <br />4. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special <br />privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or <br />buildings in the same district. <br />5. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br />ordinance. <br />The existing use of the lot as a single family residence is not threatened by the status quo. <br />There are no unique physical circumstances. The sole purpose of the variance is to allow <br />an additional lot to be created to provide economic gain. Granting an unjustified variance <br />would be conferring a special privilege and would not be in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of the ordinance. <br />Whether it is advisable to allow for the creation of additional lots in this neighborhood by <br />splitting the existing lots is a policy question that may merit consideration by the City. <br />However, the application under consideration would create a lot that does not meet <br />current requirements and there is no justification for the requested variance. Without the <br />variance, the minor subdivision cannot occur. <br />OPTIONS <br />1. Approve the minor subdivision and variance as requested by applicant. <br />2. Deny the variance based on lack of justification as described above in this report. <br />3. Deny the minor subdivision because the lot doesn't meet the minimum lot depth. <br />4. Return to staff with direction. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Options 2 and 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.