My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12/12/2001 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
12/12/2001 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2014 12:14:37 PM
Creation date
6/4/2014 11:49:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
12/12/2001
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />AGENDA ITEM V. C <br />STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser <br />C. C. MEETING DATE: December 12, 2001 <br />TOPIC: <br />BACKGROUND <br />PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance 23 -01 <br />Interim Ordinance Establishing A Moratorium <br />On Residential Development <br />The comprehensive plan sets the policy direction, while the implementation of the plan occurs <br />through official controls such as the subdivision ordinance and zoning ordinance. <br />The new comprehensive plan establishes a policy to significantly reduce the rate of growth in the <br />city. Staff is setting up a process for amending the official controls to implement the plan. This <br />will take some time to complete. We are concerned about the interim. After conferring with the <br />City Attorney, staff believes it is best to adopt a moratorium to protect the City. The proposed <br />ordinance will prohibit most types of residential development activity in the City for one year. <br />ANALYSIS <br />There are three main reasons for the moratorium. First, the City Council approved the <br />comprehensive plan but is still undergoing review by the Metropolitan Council as required by <br />state statute. Until the Met Council approves the plan, the City is in an awkward position <br />between the old, sketchy plan and the new one. Staff has been using the new plan for guidance, <br />but it is not clear how firmly we can stand on it. <br />Second, while the comprehensive plan establishes the policy of reducing growth to an average of <br />147 per year, the current official controls don't provide the means to ensure implementation of <br />the policy. The City should be in the position where if it wants to deny new development <br />applications, it should have clear and easily defensible reasons. <br />Three, we anticipate new plat, rezoning, and MUSA reserve applications in the very near future. <br />Revising the ordinances will be a major undertaking. We will have the services of our planning <br />consultant, but the project will require significant effort by staff as well. The moratorium will <br />allow staff to devote time to the ordinance project rather than attempting to review new <br />application using ordinances that may or may not support the comprehensive plan. <br />Staff is recommending the moratorium to protect the City until the ordinances are revised. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.