Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />ANALYSIS <br />The City never actually owned or was dedicated Outlot F, according to the Final Plat <br />dedication page for Clearwater Creek 3rd Addition, which states: <br />"...and do hereby donate and dedicate to the public use forever <br />the circle, courts, drives, lane, roads, park and easements for <br />drainage and utility purposes..." (Attachment 5) <br />Outlot F is unique from other Outlots within the subdivision in that it does not have <br />drainage and utility easements over it. As a result, it was never part of the property <br />dedicated to the City. Since the Outlot was never part of the property dedicated to the <br />City, and the proposed trail was never constructed, the Outlot is still owned by Gor -Em <br />Builders. Gor -Em had agreed previously to pay the City $1,000 should construction of <br />the trail not be (Attachment 6). <br />What is further needed, however, is a Minor Subdivision, dividing Outlot F in two along <br />the boundary lines of lots 1 & 14, block 3, Clearwater Creek 3rd Addition. The resulting <br />two 150' X 10' pieces would then be attached to lots 1 & 14. Such action would: <br />1. Prevent the Outlot from becoming a useless piece of land, and thus going Tax Forfeit. <br />2. Resolve the trail issue. <br />Staff has assumed that the above described two pieces should be attached to the two lots <br />south of the Outlot, rather that be divided among all four of the neighboring lots (two to <br />the north, and two to the south). This is because the Outlot and the two adjacent <br />properties to the south lie within Addition #3, while the two lots to the north lie within <br />Addition #2. Thus, even though it was originally Mr. Petronack who brought the <br />situation to the attention of the council, it does not seem appropriate to attach the <br />resulting Outlot F land to his property, since his property is located in Addition #2 and <br />the Outlot is located in Addition #3. A conversation on March 4th with Deb Petronack <br />confirmed that such an arrangement meets with the approval of the Petronacks. <br />Outlot F appears physically indistinguishable from the adjacent properties; it has been <br />sodded and taken care of by the neighboring residents and visually blends into their <br />lawns. The four property owners adjacent to Outlot F have all been notified of this <br />meeting, although it is not required that Public Notice be given in the matter of a Minor <br />Subdivision. The two affected property owners (lots 1 & 14, block 3, Addition #3) have <br />each agreed to accept the resulting 10 X 150 -foot property, which will be deeded to them <br />from Gor -Em builders, pending approval of this Minor Subdivision. <br />Thus, it is the recommendation of staff that such approval be granted with the following <br />conditions: <br />1. Gor -Em Builders will pay the City $1,000, in lieu of not having to construct the trail. <br />2. Gor -Em will deed over the two subject pieces to the adjacent two property owners to <br />the south for the nominal sum of $1.00 <br />