My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03/13/2002 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2002
>
03/13/2002 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2014 3:14:01 PM
Creation date
6/5/2014 9:41:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
03/13/2002
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AUGUST 23, 2000 <br />Council Member Carlson inquired what the City hopes to accomplish by developing the <br />trail. Staff advised the trail will be for pedestrian access. The trail is not a trail <br />connection to the major trail loop or a park. <br />Council Member O'Donnell clarified that the trail is a City trail and was required to meet <br />the ordinance. Staff added the whole plat is a PDO. The block is 200 feet longer than a <br />normal block. When the second addition was platted, the developer did not own the <br />property. When the third addition came through it was determined that the block was too <br />long. The City owns the land. The developer must grade the trails. <br />Council Member O'Donnell inquired about the main objections to the trail. <br />Mr. Patronick advised his main objection is privacy. He stated he would not have bought <br />the lot if he had known the trail would be placed there. The trail also has a steep incline <br />that raises safety issues. The trail does not tie into the main trail lo He added that the <br />house is approximately 15 -20 feet from the trail. <br />The Public Services Director stated the City has the optio <br />development or vacate the trail. Staff recommended t <br />standpoint, it has been very clear that the trail woul be <br />not an important trail connection. <br />Council directed staff to contact Mr. Quigle } for co ent. Council will consider the <br />request to vacate the trail. <br />with the trail <br />e trail. From a City <br />d there. Staff noted it is <br />This item will appear on the Cou <br />2000, 5:20 p.m. <br />TOWN CENTER DESI <br />on agenda Wednesday, September 6, <br />S. AN "ARDS, JEFF SMYSER <br />Staff advised this item <br />Council endorsement o <br />Town Center. <br />rnuation of the discussion at the last Council meeting. <br />e . esign standards would show support for the concepts in the <br />Council Member Dahl asked if the Metropolitan Council has indicated to the City that an <br />endorsement is needed. <br />The Economic Development Assistant reviewed the process for the application of the <br />Livable Communities grant noting there are two (2) phases. Phase 2 will be much more <br />detailed and include a presentation. The Advisory Committee wants to know that the <br />concepts can be implemented. The Committee has not seen the design standards. <br />Council Member Dahl asked if the grant is contingent upon mixed use or the amount of <br />multiple housing within the Town Center. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.