My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03/13/2002 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2002
>
03/13/2002 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2014 3:14:01 PM
Creation date
6/5/2014 9:41:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
03/13/2002
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION SEPTEMBER 6, 2000 <br />Council Member Dahl asked if a variance is needed if the trail is vacated. The City <br />Planner advised a variance will not be needed. <br />Mayor Bergeson inquired about the cost of the vacation. The City Engineer advised the <br />legal cost is minimal. Staff time should be charged to the developer and the developer <br />should reimburse the City for the trail installation. Historically, the City has not charged <br />for the property. <br />Staff advised someone else should be responsible for restoration of the land. <br />Mr. Petronack advised he will split the cost with the neighbors to restore the land. <br />Council Member O'Donnell stated he is in favor of vacating the easement. He stated the <br />City needs a tool to better document these types of things. <br />Mayor Bergeson stated that normally a developer should do w <br />to do. It then become a legal issue between the developer <br />that in this case he is not sure who would be using the tr <br />maintain it. <br />Council directed staff to proceed with vacating t ement. <br />OAK WILT UPDATE, MARTY ASLES C . <br />Staff advised two (2) years ago the <br />time it was believed that the City <br />was not a real problem last ye <br />Wilt as last year. The City <br />increase in Oak Wilt this d it <br />City needs to come u. with a t <br />they are going <br />wner. He stated <br />would have to <br />lot of trees due to a major storm. At that <br />of more trees due to Oak Wilt. Oak Wilt <br />eve t , 's year there is four (4) times as much Oak <br />d for state aid for tree removal. There is a huge <br />ill be a financial burden to many residents. The <br />o take care of this problem. <br />CSAH 49 RECONST ' C ' ON UPDATE, JOHN POWELL <br />Staff advised a letter has been sent to Jon Olson regarding this project. No response has <br />been received. Anoka and Ramsey County are having a meeting September 7, 2000. <br />Staff noted the City Engineer will be attending the meeting. <br />Mayor Bergeson stated the County spent $1 million dollars on Birch Street and basically <br />the City has the same road it had before. It seems that the City shot itself in the foot <br />regarding this project. The project became a political issue. The City is now stuck with <br />the road for 15 years. He stated this is a good case of politics interfering with engineering <br />and getting less than what the City needs. <br />REGULAR AGENDA, SEPTEMBER 11, 2000 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.