My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/28/2000 Environmental Board Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Minutes
>
2000
>
10/28/2000 Environmental Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2016 11:55:28 AM
Creation date
6/5/2014 4:15:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Minutes
Meeting Date
10/28/2000
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING OCTOBER 25, 2000 <br />address the density and financial economics. He explained that 2.5 -acre lots are not part <br />of a conservation development, as they can be subdivided in the future. <br />Vice Chair Davidson agreed and noted that large lots are also not conducive to wildlife <br />corridors or contiguous areas. <br />Trehus noted that with this plan the number of lots has been increased and the road right- <br />of-way reduced, which is a win-win situation for the developer but not the City. He <br />suggested there should be some tradeoffs for the City to benefit and asked if a formal <br />application has been made. <br />Mr. Adolph stated a formal application has not yet been made. <br />Mach agreed that this type of development would be attractive to older couples and empty <br />nesters so there would be a lower population. <br />To increase viewsheds, Donlin suggested Lots 7, 34, 35, 4 <br />, and 52 be removed. <br />Trehus stated he would like to see the calculations .on impervious surfaces. <br />Mach asked if it is up to the associationto address tree preservation. Asleson reviewed <br />several tree preservation/protection options used by other communities and commented <br />on the importance of assuring City input into those issues. <br />The Environmental Board indicated a desire for a fewer number of lots and more upland <br />preservation. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL BOARDSUSINESS <br />A. Landscape Ordinance Review — Asleson presented the draft Landscape Ordinance and <br />requested Board comment. <br />During discussion, the following revisions were made: <br />II. DEFINITIONS <br />Page 2: "Developer means any person or entity other than a builder, as defined herein, <br />who undertakes to improve change a parcel of land, by platting, grading, installing <br />utilities, or constructing or improving any building thereon." <br />Page 3: "Native vegetation means vegetation, composed of native plants, that has-been <br />of normative species are indigenous to the area." <br />III. APPLICABILITY <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.