Laserfiche WebLink
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 3, 2001 <br />Mr. Payton noted that in the site plan, the nighttime team leader would have all the lights <br />off, except for a corridor of lights for the employees. After the employees left, all lights <br />would be turned off except for security lights. <br />Trehus said that there should be a vote on the recommendations that include the <br />following as well as the recommendations previously stated by Mach: <br />® Set aside property off site for open space. <br />® Lighting issues were a major concern. <br />• Maximize the green in groupings, rather than in straight lines. <br />Mach moved to approve the recommendations of the Environmental Board. Trehus <br />seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />B. CSAH 49 Update/John Powell — Powell explained that the City passed a,resolution <br />because it was concluded that a joint meeting between the cities was necessary. With a <br />reduced speed limit the City supports it, then the project goes to Mn/DOT for reviewal. <br />The County Commissioners set the speed limits. Typically speed studies are done and <br />the speed that 85% of the motorists travel determines the speed limit. In addition, the <br />plan calls for more linear areas for standing water, rather than in ponds at Hodgson Road. <br />Mach asked if there was a map of the design. Powell stated that there was a map from <br />County Road J to Lake Drive. <br />Powell pointed out that with a higher speed limit, there was a need for a straighter road <br />for adequate reaction time. A lower, speed limit would allow for more curves, and a <br />narrower area for the road with 45` m.p.h. <br />Grundhofer inquired about -the necessity for four lanes. Powell indicated that the road <br />was being expanded to meet the regional need, but there was some flexibility for local <br />concerns. He noted that the road in the past was a state highway and changed to a <br />regional roadway. '11e ,indicated that the pond adjacent to Fox Trace(??) would not be <br />eliminated in the expansion of Highway 49. <br />Grundhofer;;: explained that the pond was a breeding area for three species of frogs. <br />Powell indicated that the pond was landlocked and it stayed wet all year. <br />Mach asked if an environmental impact report had been done. Powell responded that one <br />was in process, and an archeological dig found the presence of hot chards. <br />Donlin expressed the need for the EIS (Environmental Impact Survey). <br />Grundhofer stated that the bridge was a breeding ground for birds, and asked if it was <br />going to be affected. Powell answered that the widening of the bridge was essential. He <br />6 <br />