My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/31/2001 Environmental Board Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Minutes
>
2001
>
01/31/2001 Environmental Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2016 1:25:26 PM
Creation date
6/5/2014 4:20:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Minutes
Meeting Date
01/31/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 31, 2001 <br />recommendations, the Board concurred with staff in promoting native vegetation, along <br />with the standard recommendations. <br />Mr. Dalbee, Project Designer for Ryan Companies US, Inc., indicated that an <br />environmental architect had been hired. <br />Donlin complimented the use of premium cut off lamps because it was a good choice to <br />reduce glare, and suggested to staff that the information about these lamps be given to <br />Target. <br />Chair Lanyon stated that the Board recommended the project. <br />D. VFW Post 6583/Apollo Drive (Item 1-04) — Asleson read the background sheet. The <br />VFW wishes to sell 1.5 acres and have the area surveyed. Staff recommends that the <br />elderberries on the bank's property be extended to Lake Drive, and that the Board should <br />approve the request to sell and survey the VFW land. He asked for comments. <br />O'Connell asked for a clarification who the buyers would be. Asleson, answered a dental <br />group, and that it was zoned commercial. <br />Donlin inquired about the access road. Asleson indicated :it would be on the regional road <br />Apollo Drive. <br />Chair Lanyon questioned if the property had ,77.e.levance to thegreenway. Asleson <br />answered the woodland in the eastern part weatened. a} <br />No additional recommendations with staffrecommendations included from the Board <br />were stated. The project was approved unanimously. <br />E. 12th and Holly Drive/Subdivisiolication.Review (Item 1-05) — The background <br />for agenda Item 1-05 was read by Asleson The area on the northern side had been <br />impacted, and shows no evidence oarm or unique species. Staff visited the site and <br />made recommendations Asleson asked for any new recommendations. <br />Grundhofer suggested shortening the road and removing Lot 5. <br />Donlin stated that:withthe possibility of rich fen on the site, there should be no grading. <br />In the past, the area`was;a wetland, a bog type landscape, and quite wet. <br />Asleson noted 'thatthe went to look at the site, it had been heavily impacted, and ditched <br />in the west:.,, <br />Chair Lanyon asked what recourse the Board had to respond to the delineation of the <br />project plan, and if there was disagreement, could it be recommended that the report be <br />repeated. <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.