My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/27/2001 Environmental Board Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Minutes
>
2001
>
06/27/2001 Environmental Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2016 11:59:45 AM
Creation date
6/5/2014 4:25:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Minutes
Meeting Date
06/27/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JUNE 27, 2001 <br />Chair Lanyon pointed out the Board could make a statement such as "We do not <br />recommend this project goes forth until...the Watershed District is contacted. <br />Trehus asked if it could slip through the cracks without contacting the Watershed District. <br />O'Connell answered it would be possible if the garage was under 5,000 -sq. ft. <br />Chair Lanyon stated that since they were asking for a variance they could be asked to <br />contact the Watershed District. Asleson suggested also inquiring on the effects of the <br />additional impervious surfaces and water volumes. <br />Trehus summarized the motion is to indicate that the Board does not support or oppose <br />the variance request, however, because the proposed project lies within a lake protection <br />area as described in the Environmental Handbook, the Board recommends: <br />• The homeowner should contact the Watershed District to ensure no wetlands would <br />be impacted. <br />• Without knowing the exact size of the building it is unknown if the project would <br />exceed the allowable fill limits. <br />• Landscape for surface water management to minimize impact on wetlands. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br />C. Pinnacle Towers Update — Asieson stated the application had been `withdrawn. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD BUSINESS <br />Ab <br />A. Draft Comprehensive Plan — Grochala stated:hheCity Council had adopted the <br />Comprehensive Plan, which the City had been workington for several years. He believed <br />the Plan was a unique work that wouldlbe a dcument that staff could work with. It had <br />set goals for total population and housing units..:'here were still several issues that <br />would need to be dealt with as part of the implementation of the plan. <br />Grochala commented that thecounccl has reviewed the Environment Boards goals and <br />tabled discussion until the next councils eeting with the intent of having a board <br />representative presentl He -also directed the boards attention to the letter from Linda <br />Waite -Smith which indicated that the Council's desire to meet with the board and discuss <br />its role, goals and friferactilin with other boards <br />m41 Tei <br />viky <br />Chair Lanyon noted; this item had been tabled until the July 9, 2001 meeting. He asked if <br />anyone could be at the meeting. He stated that it could be discussed at the joint meeting <br />and inquiresl•a'bout.ethmechanism to keep the cap at 147 units/year. <br />ref-Grochala painted out that the Council approved the Comprehensive Plan, but it still <br />needed Metropolitan Council approval. The Comprehensive Plan becomes the basis to <br />draft ordinances and other laws. The Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance will be revised <br />as part of the implementation strategy to provide the necessary growth controls. <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.