My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08/29/2001 Environmental Board Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Minutes
>
2001
>
08/29/2001 Environmental Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2016 11:58:09 AM
Creation date
6/5/2014 4:28:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Minutes
Meeting Date
08/29/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING AUGUST 29, 2001 <br />O'Connell inquired about an automated gantry elevator. Asleson answered that it was an <br />elevator with a rail. <br />Donlin stated that since the company had unfulfilled promises, they should not receive <br />approval until those promises had been fulfilled. Since the company preceded the <br />housing developments—Buyer Beware. She did not want Molin to be alienated, because <br />they have given back to the City. <br />Grochala addressed the issue assuring the Board that the company has worked with staff, <br />and the Conditional Use Permit processing caused misunderstandings. He felt that Molin <br />had tried to comply and would continue to do so. <br />Trehus questioned if there was any information regarding the environmental impact <br />submitted, dealing with the issue of hid pH, or a treatment system withrthe Rice Creek <br />Watershed District. <br />O'Connell agreed with Chair Lanyon that there was*need for more information. Trehus <br />recommended tabling the project until the information was subnutted. <br />O'Connell inquired about any new chemicals 1Vlolm:rrynght,be using, and their <br />environmental impacts. <br />Trehus asked about the location of the vetland. <br />Chair Lanyon posed the question as to why no landscape plan was submitted. Asleson <br />responded that there were no trees. to'rep'ort. <br />Grundhofer noted that landscape plans were required for additions such as garages for <br />residents. <br />Grundhofer made a n .oti on to .table1he discussion until Molin submitted a tree inventory, <br />a landscape plan, estimates of r m' off, `and a lighting plan. Donlin seconded the motion. <br />motion carried unanimously• <br />E. Market Place i;pdate Discussed as a part of the Ryan/Target update. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL. BOARD BUSINESS <br />A. Comprehensive'Plan Update — Grochala commented that the Plan would be submitted <br />to the Metropolitan Council early next week. The delay was due to outdated maps from <br />1988 needed updating. Gretz was working on the Surface Water Management Plan, and <br />John Powell was working to make the Comprehensive Plan compatible with the <br />Watershed District. <br />B. Environmental Board Goals 2001 — Asleson suggested that the Board discuss the <br />special meeting with the City Council in this section. A date for the meeting was <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.