My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11/28/2001 Environmental Board Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Minutes
>
2001
>
11/28/2001 Environmental Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2016 5:06:06 PM
Creation date
6/5/2014 4:32:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Minutes
Meeting Date
11/28/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING NOVEMBER 28, 2001 <br />Chair Kukonen inquired if staff had visited Evergreen Trail. Asleson <br />stated that there was deplotia blight and pine bark beetle present. White <br />pines were the only ones native to the area. Staff indicated that the risk <br />needed to be reduced and stands needed to be thinned. <br />Donlin commented that the push for red pines may have been a mistake for <br />the DNR. <br />Grundhofer stated that in the southwest comer of the map there was a stand <br />of oaks, and expressed concern about fire risk. Asle4gnswered that the <br />risk was not as high as for pines. He added that the Ineso4a land <br />classification that the DNR was putting together wo4d 1fitke issues. <br />Donlin inquired regarding how much credibility.1.fad who was <br />contracted to do the project for the DNR. Aste4.61,02nded that he was <br />an astute botanist, and had the trust of the DNR. andCity staff. <br />Donlin questioned his years of experience,: AsicSOn-Inswered that he had <br />years of researching, and had worketfgr4irikon Environmental. The <br />DNR found that Lino Lakes had ve7IliritWOosystems, the most of any <br />in the local area. The project resCWIRQ helig'determine the locations of <br />the greenways, and identify locitfion'illoegotiate protection. Staff noted <br />that the proposed deadline for W61,clw?) 81,: -Ls November 7, and he was in <br />0- • tti,m+P-,,,,-4;47 . <br />the process of organizing,th.. inIoimthon, which mcluded Carlos Avery <br />and probably Hugo. <br />Grundhofer prese R; b6�1 that was available through the DNR <br />regarding opportunities thAtain funds to purchase land. Asleson <br />responded that hettt the grant book, had applied for a 50/50 cost <br />share grant,. and DNR.stated that it would pay 100%. But, because it <br />was to be ,e was no rush to purchase, they decided to <br />wait. .0 <br />ofer adc1eSsed the issue of the land behind the elementary school. <br />eseitif Wred mat the City needed a Conservation Ordinance. He <br />a ;#the College of Natural Resources was doing a wetland <br />0.4t <br />ass -ssment of the area, looking at hypothetical wetland protection. <br />O'Connell inquired about whether the older developments with fire risk <br />had been shown to the Economic Development people. Asleson stated Mr. <br />Bennett was going to take the lead on the project, and staff would be a <br />resource. He indicated that it could be incorporated into zoning laws. <br />Donlin expressed concern about discussing prescribed bums and the fear <br />that might surround the issue due to the assessment. Asleson noted that the <br />areas were small and easy to contain, and prescribed bums would actually <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.