My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12/19/2001 Environmental Board Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Minutes
>
2001
>
12/19/2001 Environmental Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2016 5:04:50 PM
Creation date
6/5/2014 4:34:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Minutes
Meeting Date
12/19/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING DECEMBER 19, 2001 <br />facilitating the meetings. All the work would need to be done in about ten months. <br />Each Board would choose the members for the task force. <br />Kukonen inquired about the possibility of alternates if someone was unable to attend. <br />Grochala responded that he was trying to build continuity and consensus. He would <br />be returning to the Board in January. A land use workshop would be held and <br />Council is strongly urging attendance. NEMO would be making a presentation in the <br />beginning on January 26, 2002, food would be provided, and the workshop would run <br />from about 8:30 a.m.- 3:30 or 4:00 p.m. The task force would probably begin in <br />February. <br />Kukonen asked who would be conducting the workshop. Groc, <br />unsure who would conduct the workshop. <br />ed he was <br />y7 <br />Trehus inquired if the Conservation Handbook on geenw ysmwould a coming into <br />la Grochala stated it would playa bigpart in setting u` the csidential PDO. The <br />play. � g p �,f <br />greenways would be in the Subdivision part. He atteinp ed; to reak out the policies <br />in the areas of the Environmental Board, the greenways4, and the Park Board. <br />Trehus stated the suitable land use for greenway"woual, and the City should <br />attempt to correlate it with the buffers. Hp, e the memo dated April 11, 2001 had <br />useful information to incorporate, or to use as a s wing point. <br />Grochala indicated it would be benefit iate,if a developer follows a given list of <br />rules, the project would probably Vele ommended. It would avoid the conflicts of <br />the past. <br />Trehus noted the most imp <br />circles. <br />Kukonen asked if thosco <br />Conservation Subd ii on <br />in the Handbook was the three intersecting <br />ing *workshop knew that a goal was to establish a <br />ante. Grochala assured the Board that they knew. <br />Donlm e pressedreonceni o cr,the two numbers in the Comprehensive Plan, 147 new <br />households/veal a'ka and aa20,500 population cap assuming 2.5 <br />people/housepl`Grochala answered that household sizes could fluctuate over the <br />20 year plana%" period. <br />Donlin reiterated that the two numbers meant everything. <br />Grochala noted that Pheasant Hills was the only development that could be approved <br />if the moratorium went through. January 14, 2002 was the deadline to be heard by <br />the Planning and Zoning Board in February, and go to Council in March. The <br />Moratorium will probably cover only residential developments. The Metropolitan <br />Council had not signed off the Comprehensive Plan. <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.