My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/30/2002 Environmental Board Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Minutes
>
2002
>
01/30/2002 Environmental Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/20/2016 12:46:58 PM
Creation date
6/5/2014 4:36:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Minutes
Meeting Date
01/30/2002
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 30, 2002 <br />Chair Kukonen stated the information was useful, and was what was needed right <br />now. Ms. Booth responded that the case studies for the information would be the <br />Tree Protection Ordinance and the Landscape Ordinance. <br />Asleson indicated that the Board would be electing two members to sit on a panel <br />for ordinance revision. <br />Ms. Booth stated that the information would result in better Natural Resource <br />Assessments. The Minnesota Landcover Classification SySteti)T:ixe\Feived some of <br />the money dedicated to it and maps made up a large part of th64-'endices. <br />Mr. Husveth stated he worked with Critical Connections Landscape Landscapc IIcology, and <br />•noted that he covered 38,000 acres in Blaine, Ham La.ke7.- es; and <br />Columbus Township. He found 40 rare species withiii the City. Some were <br />significant in the State and had not been seen for .r ears. He was <br />attempting to identify a greenway between the RiA of Lakes and <br />Carlos Avery to guide development.He used thetrandcover Classification <br />System's five levels, with land use as the logeS14.ebased on soil, vegetation, <br />imperviousness and hydrology. An3exeple of Leve 1 <br />was a forest, Level 2 <br />would be a deciduous forest, Level:ifitciduous forest, Level 4 oak forest, <br />and Level 5 was Oak forest dry sub,typt 1t detail, and field checked. The <br />map used standard colors to dep 4'covers. The dark areas were <br />residential and mostly impervi9igkrIgWas forest, brown was herbaceous <br />and wetland areas, the beige .,arfak,„;,,grshrubs, and blue was open water. The <br />second map showed the treecarqpy, and the darkest color was 80-100% <br />land cover. <br />Pely, <br />Ms. Booth stated that earlo cover has been linked with air quality, heat affecting <br />temperatures, ancV4thePfaleto <br />„4. <br />Mr. Husveth pointed third map labeled MLCSS which identified areas of <br />high, niodei-ate, and Iow-tplity in the City, with white showing the areas which <br />no longer signiticance. He credited Asleson with the discovery of the <br />area of wel. meadow with rich fen along the pipeline corridor. He noted an <br />unidentified Oecies of plant was found to be classified as the common name tooth <br />cup and was last sighted in 1987 in Cedar Creek. Special interest sites were a <br />residential area adjacent to the prison that could be a neighborhood project, and an <br />aspen forest in the northwest even though there were no rare species found there. <br />He added that the maps could be overlaid on other maps because of the G.I.S. <br />Asleson stated that Mr. Husveth included notes that gave clarifications and greater <br />detail that the maps could not show. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.