My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/30/2002 Environmental Board Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Minutes
>
2002
>
01/30/2002 Environmental Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/20/2016 12:46:58 PM
Creation date
6/5/2014 4:36:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Minutes
Meeting Date
01/30/2002
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 30, 2002 <br />Donlin noted another reason for the no wake zone was that the birds plunge dive <br />to feed feet first, and they need to be able to see into the water. <br />Mr. LeBlanc restated that they were looking for the regulation of structures on the <br />lake. <br />Asleson asked the Board for a recommendation for the next Council meeting. <br />Chair Kukonen indicated the County owned the land, and could enforce a buffer. <br />Asleson explained that the buffer would be only 300 feet, atid,thatajornt local <br />level enforcement was also necessary. <br />Donlin asked if the County would have jurisdiction becauseit4,yns,:te land and <br />the course was attached to the bottom. Schneider answe.rcd.it was lIie regulation <br />,of the water, not the land, and the water goes with <br />Mr. LeBlanc explained the surface water was notthe jurisdiction of the County, <br />but local. The north side was clear because •;)f the aquatic plants present. Donlin <br />agreed even if it was not about the birds, sdifilicate the water quality. <br />O'Dea inquired if the no wake restricadiita separate from the structures on <br />the lake. Asleson stated it would notrtippen'ilya. timely fashion. <br />n1,14N7V <br />46, ,OF <br />A discussion ensued on slalom courses o'firSter skiing. <br />Mr. LeBlanc indicated thex‘csplenty f precedence for these requests on the <br />size of the lake. It involkOivii8c: lies that were using the slalom course, but <br />there were 40 other families in the Iake association. He believed the community <br />cared about the issue--, <br />Donlin asked iC there w rpiny concerns of the Council. <br />Aslcsouslatedtliat the lbcus of the recommendation should be the resource issue. <br />He asked.i'fee'ommendation. <br />%L.. ... <br />Schneiderree.,9mmended that a no wake zone be enforced 24 hours a day, and no <br />structures btVut on the lake. <br />O'Connell inquired if the structures or the actual water skiing caused the <br />disturbance. Mr. LeBlanc responded that the structures cause intense activity in <br />one area that created a channel at about 34 miles/hour. <br />Asleson stated that it would not be in effect in the south part of the lake, from an <br />environmental standpoint. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.