My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03/27/2002 Environmental Board Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Minutes
>
2002
>
03/27/2002 Environmental Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2016 12:09:35 PM
Creation date
6/5/2014 4:39:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Minutes
Meeting Date
03/27/2002
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING MARCH 27, 2002 <br />• Street lighting should be downward focused, no spillage. <br />• As long as the developer was requesting a re -zoning would he consider a PDO <br />to preserve an additional 17 acre additional open space. <br />• Signage should be placed on buffer boundaries to indicate buffers exist, and <br />covenants should be established with the homeowners' association prohibiting <br />encroachment. <br />Halen seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />6. DISCUSSION ITEMS <br />A. Development Regulations Task Force Update <br />Chair Kukonen presented the update. They were asked thcir dbsire to have <br />development patterned after non-sewered, Jackson Mcadchyind apply the <br />principles used there. The Comprehensive Plan re ult. 1.5thouses per acre. <br />Asleson stated that the issue was economics. and tkelots were not necessarily <br />variable within the development, but closerUtRit#pt that achieved open space <br />in the back. The costs effecting infrastwV5wereliiirowing the roadways, <br />reducing the length of the pipes, and utility"6017*. <br />Grundhofer questioned economiqcente3a motivation. Asleson answered if <br />the market supported the chang developers would do it. <br />Chair Kukonen urged the <br />neighborhoods and park <br />)pictures of attractively designed <br />lide presentation could be compiled. <br />Asleson stated that vista crearqn,and houses closer to the streets with porches <br />;TA <br />were popular. <br />Chair Kukonen noted atIthe City had considered making it a three step process, <br />with 0.7Environrnental Board receiving a sketch plan to work with the developers <br />earlier*T the pr.ocss. 'Oretz answered that it was not going to pass, because it <br />would nlifiR a for enough time for the City to respond within the 120 day <br />period. In*tiqd it would be rolled into the preliminary plat requirements. <br />711,- <br />Asleson addressed the ownership of buffer areas and greenways. He urged the use <br />of covenants in buffer areas. The greenways needed to be public ownership, not <br />for maintenance purposes, but for the good of the public with no encroachment of <br />easements or property lines. <br />B. Goals/2003 <br />6 APPROVED MINUTES <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.