Laserfiche WebLink
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING MARCH 27, 2002 <br />• Street lighting should be downward focused, no spillage. <br />• As long as the developer was requesting a re -zoning would he consider a PDO <br />to preserve an additional 17 acre additional open space. <br />• Signage should be placed on buffer boundaries to indicate buffers exist, and <br />covenants should be established with the homeowners' association prohibiting <br />encroachment. <br />Halen seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />6. DISCUSSION ITEMS <br />A. Development Regulations Task Force Update <br />Chair Kukonen presented the update. They were asked thcir dbsire to have <br />development patterned after non-sewered, Jackson Mcadchyind apply the <br />principles used there. The Comprehensive Plan re ult. 1.5thouses per acre. <br />Asleson stated that the issue was economics. and tkelots were not necessarily <br />variable within the development, but closerUtRit#pt that achieved open space <br />in the back. The costs effecting infrastwV5wereliiirowing the roadways, <br />reducing the length of the pipes, and utility"6017*. <br />Grundhofer questioned economiqcente3a motivation. Asleson answered if <br />the market supported the chang developers would do it. <br />Chair Kukonen urged the <br />neighborhoods and park <br />)pictures of attractively designed <br />lide presentation could be compiled. <br />Asleson stated that vista crearqn,and houses closer to the streets with porches <br />;TA <br />were popular. <br />Chair Kukonen noted atIthe City had considered making it a three step process, <br />with 0.7Environrnental Board receiving a sketch plan to work with the developers <br />earlier*T the pr.ocss. 'Oretz answered that it was not going to pass, because it <br />would nlifiR a for enough time for the City to respond within the 120 day <br />period. In*tiqd it would be rolled into the preliminary plat requirements. <br />711,- <br />Asleson addressed the ownership of buffer areas and greenways. He urged the use <br />of covenants in buffer areas. The greenways needed to be public ownership, not <br />for maintenance purposes, but for the good of the public with no encroachment of <br />easements or property lines. <br />B. Goals/2003 <br />6 APPROVED MINUTES <br />