My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/24/2002 Environmental Board Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Minutes
>
2002
>
04/24/2002 Environmental Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2016 12:07:48 PM
Creation date
6/5/2014 4:40:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Minutes
Meeting Date
04/24/2002
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING APRIL 24, 2002 <br />Asleson noted the use of hackberries along the Northern edge. Donlin responded <br />that they were not thick enough to block the view and suggested berming. <br />Asleson explained that hackberries take 3-4 years to become established. <br />Schneider liked the hackberries because they were good for wildlife, and were a <br />good long-term choice. <br />Grundhofer noted that they were planning to use maples on site. <br />Grundhofer mentioned landscaping fennel reed grass, but she could not find any <br />information on it. Asleson indicated he did not think it would be a problem, but <br />would check. <br />Chair Kukonen reviewed the recommendations <br />e'Board that included: <br />• Work with the RCWD and City staff on the Stormwater Management Plan. <br />• Lighting should have no spillage, be downward focused,' and the reduction of <br />the number of fixtures. <br />Work with City staff to create buffering on the perimeter. <br />• Replace maple with some other appropriate species .- <br />• Reduce impervious parking spaces to a„mimmum, and maximize the use of <br />Netlawn pervious parking. <br />• Concern over the gas station, and the possibility of a spill into the area defined <br />as a lake protection zone and'having high ecological value. <br />Schneider made amotion to pass onstaff recommendations along with the Board <br />recommendation Don1in seconded the,motion. Motion passed unanimously. <br />Schneider stated there nee ded:to:be a number in the recommendation to ensure <br />compliance with the spirit of therecommendation, and not to leave it at the <br />obscure term reduce. <br />• <br />B. Raske Building Systems, Inc. <br />Asleson reviewed the background. The Board had reviewed the plan at the <br />October 1, 2001, meeting, so the recommendations made at that time still apply. <br />The only item left to review was the landscaping plan. His only concern was the <br />small cedars on the site, they were going to be removed, but he would like to see <br />then used elsewhere on the site. He highlighted the standard recommendations, <br />and the Board recommendations on Attachment 1 Options. <br />Donlin expressed concern over the surface water, inquiring if the owners of the <br />two lots were going to work together. Asleson indicated that the wetland was a <br />pond. <br />4 DRAFT MINUTES <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.