Laserfiche WebLink
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETINGMARCH 26, 2003 <br />4 APPROVED MINUTES <br />Chair Kukonen commented on clustering houses that Quigley’s development <br />approached 50% open space. Ravens Hollow reflected a better plan than could be <br />attained with the R-EC. <br />Donlin expressed concern that the oaks remaining would be standing in water. <br />Mr. Goertz stated that there was an outlet if the area had too much water. <br />Asleson stated that he had been receiving calls concerning West Nile Virus, <br />which he referred to the Metropolitan Mosquito Control. Donlin noted that <br />poisoning was not the answer, but a healthy wetland with the natural predators to <br />keep them in check. <br />Asleson indicated that most of the wetlands would not be breeding areas because <br />they only bred in stagnant water. He noted there had been the introduction of <br />exotics and recorded changes in bat and frog populations. Donlin added there <br />were 50 species of mosquitoes in Minnesota, with only 28 species that bite <br />people. The chances of contracting the disease were extremely low. <br />O’Dea suggested that Donlin write an article for the City newsletter relating to <br />mosquitoes and the West Nile Virus. <br />Chair Kukonen reviewed the recommendations, and the Board composed the <br />following statement: <br />“Even though this falls short of the goals of Conservation Development, we <br />are endorsing it, because of the developer’s commitment and willingness to <br />preserve open space, without the high density normally required in these <br />projects in this zoning district. The following recommendations were also <br />included: <br />• Address staff recommendations. <br />• Add restrictions in the homeowners’ association by-laws to emphasize <br />preventing the removal of existing vegetation and significant trees. <br />• Soften the tree lines thereby keeping the wood lots as natural as possible. <br />• Work with City Forester to preserve the stands of significant trees.” <br />Mr. Goertz addressed the southeast area of the site, where the zoning was 3-6 <br />units per acre. The areas were too small, and one was under water. He asked <br />adjacent neighbors and they did not want townhomes. He indicated that he might <br />have to come up with a new plan because it went against the Comprehensive Plan. <br />He believed that the plan fit the area better, and spoke with staff about amending <br />the Comprehensive Plan. <br />Grundhofer inquired about the water flowing to the southeast toward the road. <br />Asleson answered that the vast majority was flowing to the southeast, but a small <br />amount was going into the ditch. He noted that nine years ago there were wet <br />areas. They were disturbed but could be restored in the future.