My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/09/2003 Environmental Board Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Minutes
>
2003
>
07/09/2003 Environmental Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2022 10:40:25 AM
Creation date
6/6/2014 9:36:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Minutes
Meeting Date
07/09/2003
Env Bd Meeting Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETINGJULY 9, 2003 <br />2 APPROVED MINUTES <br />Grochala stated that by the end of July a preliminary plat would be submitted. <br />Mr. Moberg continued that Panettoni would like to break ground in October. <br />A 50-foot easement was called for on the creek or the official name Anoka <br />County ditch #10. There was a swale or ditch leading to the creek that would <br />disappear and be rerouted around the building on the Northeast side. <br />Grundhofer inquired about the distance from the creek to the building. Mr. <br />Moberg responded the closest was 75 feet, in addition all the vegetation would be <br />preserved around the creek. A southbound right turn lane would need to be <br />added. <br />Grundhofer questioned if two lanes would be provided for people going home <br />onto Lake Drive. Mr. Moberg answered that there was no definite answer, but <br />there would be no problems with it. The issue would be dealt with in the <br />Planning and Zoning Board. He did not believe traffic would be impacted with <br />the first site. All the proposals thus far had been in accordance with the zoning <br />laws and no conditional use were required. Some consultant work had been for <br />Phase I showing nothing significant beyond building materials. An archeological <br />consultant has information requested and pending. He admitted that it was still a <br />work in progress. <br />Mr. Hiniker reiterated that the groundbreaking was scheduled to take place in <br />October, but that it had to meet the deadlines. If the EAW was favorable, it <br />would go to Council, then to the publisher by July 21, 2003. The 30-day review <br />process would follow, with the Council deciding if more studies would be <br />required in October. <br />O’Dea inquired the direction of the flow of the creek. Mr. Moberg responded it <br />was west to east and on to Marshan Lake. <br />Chair Kukonen questioned if there were plans for buffering for noise and light <br />pollution. <br />Asleson referred to the Environmental Assessment information and language and <br />noted that the conditions were not present for any rare species except possibly <br />some tuber orchids. <br />Mr. Moberg stated the entire site was a Lake Protection Zone, so surface water <br />diversion was a concern. Asleson added the surface water on site would go to <br />treatment ponds. <br />Chair Kukonen inquired if the water would end up in Marshan Lake. Mr. Moberg <br />referred to Figure 4 Landcover Map shown in dark blue, that with the rerouting, it <br />could go into two ponds before the creek and ultimately into Marshan Lake.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.