My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11/06/2003 Environmental Board Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Minutes
>
2003
>
11/06/2003 Environmental Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2022 10:40:26 AM
Creation date
6/6/2014 9:41:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Minutes
Meeting Date
11/06/2003
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING NOVEMBER 6, 2003 <br />O'Dea referred to the last sentence in 11 a, inquiring if there would be any impact <br />as a result of the removal of the infiltration basins. Mr. Moberg answered there <br />would not be any negative impact. <br />Donlin admitted at the present time there was surface runoff, but she was looking <br />for no net change in quality or quantity. <br />O'Dea asked for clarification for question #12 answered as "no." Asleson <br />responded that the basins were not being used, he had never sighted water present <br />in them, they were merely two holes. <br />O'Dea mentioned it appeared it would be an alteration if they were functioning. <br />She inquired if there was a need to state they were not functioning. Grundhofer <br />suggested stating that they were never utilized. <br />Mr. Rogers suggested stating, "they were never utilized but constructed in <br />anticipation for future development." <br />Grundhofer inquired if there would be any alterations any wetlands off site as a <br />result of the development. Mr. Rogers answered that there might be a need for <br />dewatering, referring to #13 on p. 13. <br />Mr. Moberg explained that the water needed to be far enough away, so that it <br />would not be a risk for the workers. He indicated that figures in #16 were <br />estimates. <br />Grundhofer questioned if there would be any excavation xcavation or importation of soils. <br />Mr. Moberg answered that the area was probably topsoil poor. <br />Asleson stated that everything else would be formal plantings. <br />Chair Kukonen inquired about the possibility of the existing vegetation becoming <br />disturbed in #16 on p. 16., Mr. Rogers answered that the vegetation would be <br />maintained and kept as natural. <br />Grundhofer asked for the location of the slopes that approached 12%. MT. <br />Moberg answered that 12% was the trigger figure for erosion concerns. <br />Grochala explained that the only place where 12% was approached was by the <br />road curve. <br />Grundhofer inquired about the meaning of "live storage" referring to the <br />memorandum #17 on p. 16. Mr. Moberg explained live storage was the amount <br />of bounce above the normal water level. He admitted it was more problematic in <br />7 APPROVED MINUTES <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.