My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08/31/2005 Environmental Board Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Minutes
>
2005
>
08/31/2005 Environmental Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2022 10:40:45 AM
Creation date
6/6/2014 10:46:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Minutes
Meeting Date
08/31/2005
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING AUGUST 31, 2005 <br />Bor clarified that the concern was for general functionality. O’Dea added that the <br />size of the area needed to be large enough to handle expanding recycling. <br /> <br />Mr. James stated that their engineers were working with City staff. He added <br />there would be recycling in the residential apartments, and assured the Board he <br />would explore the area. <br /> <br />O’Dea expressed concern about the lighting in the parking lot, because it <br />appeared that the C-41 did not meet City requirements. Asleson answered that it <br />was a flush mounted light, and would be uniform throughout the project. He <br />indicated that the Type B wall mount did not meet the City requirements. <br /> <br />Mr. James assured the Board that they would meet the City requirements for <br />lighting. <br /> <br />Kukonen asked Mr. James to address the parking details. Mr. James responded <br />the hotel had its own parking, and met the requirements for the City. The other <br />commercial sites would have shared parking. The apartments would have shared <br />parking, while the assisted housing would have underground parking. <br /> <br />Grundhofer inquired if there were plans for a gas station. Mr. James answered <br />there were no plans for one at this point. <br /> <br />Grundhofer questioned if Green Velvet Boxwood was a good choice. Asleson <br />responded that it was not very hardy. <br /> <br />Mr. James stated they would work with staff on the vegetation. Asleson added <br />that there was a general plan submitted, but staff had not yet addressed it. It <br />would be traffic calming and consistent throughout the village. <br /> <br />Grundhofer inquired about the roof drainage. Asleson responded that there would <br />be opportunities for innovative ideas in this area. It would go into the surface <br />water train, and would be directed onto pervious areas. <br /> <br />O’Dea expressed concern about the vent cleaning of the building. Asleson <br />clarified that it should drain into the building. He questioned if there were plans <br />for litter pick-up in the parking lot. Mr. James answered that the association <br />would be responsible for upkeep in the common areas. <br /> <br />Bor asked the developer to look at the HVAC systems to ensure that the food <br />smells did not escape, and also the air intake in the buildings. <br /> <br />Grundhofer questioned if the building designs would support rooftop gardens. <br /> <br />Kukonen made a motion to recommend approval with staff recommendations and <br />the following Board recommendations: <br />5 APPROVED MINUTES
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.