08/14/2002 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• • Planning & Zoning Board July 10, 2002 Page 12 to service future development through 2010. Upon approval of the 2001 Comprehensive Plan Update, by Metropolitan Council, the proposed residential development would be eligible for the MUSA Allocation of 54.73 acres based on the following findings: 1. The application for 54.73 acres of MUSA was being made in conjunction with the request for preliminary plat approval. 2. The applicant had requested an R -1X zoning designation be applied to the proposed development consistent with the proposed land use contained in the 2001 Comprehensive Plan. Such request had been made in conjunction with the preliminary plat request. 3. The property lies immediately south of Pheasant Hills Preserve, which was within the existing MUSA. The property lies within a Stage, g .• , area as defined in the 2001 Comprehensive Plan. 4. Development of the property was considered fr „� tih` `�� Existing utilities were located immediately to the north of the si 5. Development of the property was consider Proposed roadways into the site would co Sherman Lake Road. sion of existing roadways. g Pheasant Hills Drive and 6. Development of the property was e viroiun :.11y ,' patible with the surrounding area. The proposed development had �� ized er pact existing wetlands and tree cover on the site. Approximately 2 res of °13.07 -acre site (27 %) would remain undeveloped. 7. The proposed d The City's P 100% cash cope of the City's 1992 Park and Trail Plan. ted the proposed development and recommended a 8. The Developme ° sist . }' th the City's Comprehensive Water and Sewer Plan. 9. Development of the pro : all not adversely affect the health, welfare, and general safety of the community. 10. Birch Street (CSAH 10) was adequate to handle the additional traffic generated by the proposed development subject to the improvements specified by Anoka County. The developer would be responsible for the necessary upgrades to CSAH 10. 11. The project was proposed to be phased over two years. The phasing plan calls for 52 lots in 2002 and 50 lots in 2003. Staff noted the applicant had requested the rezoning of the subject property from R, Rural to R -1X, Single Family Executive. In consideration of rezonings, the Planning and Zoning Board must consider possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment based on the following criteria: