09/11/2002 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• • • Planning & Zoning Board August 14, 2002 Page 27 Sheila Peterson, 7748 Mustang Lane, stated they were told it was wetland and would never be developed. She stated they were told no road would ever go through there. She agreed with everything Mr. Kirchuck had said. She stated she was very upset by this proposal. She expressed concern for the safety of the children in the area. She stated if this was approved, there be more than one access. She expressed concern regarding the traffic. Jim Obula ( ?sp), representative of Lino Air Park Association, expressed concern regarding the current residents in the area, turning Carl Street into a collector street, and the impact of this development on the Air Park. He expressed concern about pedestrians crossing the runway. He expressed concern about neise impact to the proposed development from the Air Park. He requested fence w andscaping be made to reduce pedestrian traffic and as a sound barrier e bxp sed concern about the airspace around the Air Park. He stated they did not bo wie C �t needed to be a collector at this time. Linda Eckhardt, 215 Palomino Lane, "I am no however, I have been advised that to assure the continued usage of our prope for rose for which I have purchased it, it would be best to go on re rc ' y con . I also want to be clear u.� that my comments reflect my personal concerns. _ of speaking on behalf of the airp purchased my ' build my house, I knew I was airpark. When I urchased m land an u • �_� a� a �� purchasing land that would be co Leto anrpa-,community. That was the sole reason I decided to purchase this m I has many other lots but the deciding . o ±': h. � � � factor was the fact that my horn - uld be p . Wig. airpark community which would afford me the opportunity to b e ger, keep a plane in my backyard and to be able to fly that plane from ay kyard. It was a community for which the City of Lino Lakes • Dep at of Transportation had developed ordinances an lations t rt its operation, safety and the safety of others in the area. The - had been in cation for many years prior to my purchasing this land. Other ho ne built before since have been given permits by the city to build hangers. The city ab shed regulations about sizes of the hangers, the setbacks of our house and our hangers and i[shed other regulations which endorsed this property as one which would be entr entitle have and operate an airpark. My concern is that I be able to keep the right and ability . use the property for the purpose that it was purchased. I would like to be assured that any new development that is approved in Lino Lakes does not infringe on the agreements established by the City of Lino Lakes for safety and the operation of aircraft on this airpark. I additionally, want to the assurance that those existing regulations that effect the land and airspace safety zones for the operation of this airpark, not be modified or changed whereas to make operations unsafe or non- operational. Houses must not be allowed to be built which enter into the air safety zone either by being too close to our runway or being so tall as to enter the transition zones. Clearly, the City of Lino Lakes has supported the usage of the airpark and the airpark community be establishing a history of regulations and the issuance of permits. So as you consider approving the development in question tonight, I ask you to assure that your approval would in no way allow for any infringement on our rights and ability to utilize the airpark for its intended purpose. Given that this assurance is made and the City DRAFT MINUTES