09/11/2002 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• Planning & Zoning Board August 14, 2002 Page 2 Mr. Lyden made a MOTION to close Open Mike at 6:41 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 5 -0. V. ACTION ITEMS A. Mary Zehowski, 900 Oak Lane, Minor Subdivision Staff explained Mary Zehowski is applying for a Minor Subdivision of 30 acres, zoned Rural, at 900 Oak Lane. Although the minimum lot size for property in a Rural zone is 10 acres, Ms. Zehowski is seeking to create a 2.5 -acre parcel and a 27.5 -acre parcel, as allowed under Section 3, subd. 3.A.2.b.2 of the Lino Lakes City Code: "Habitable single family homes constructed prior to reduce their lot size to a minimum of one acre results in a parcel of ten acres, or is serviced be demonstrated by means satisfactory to the not result in ground water, soil, or other contain the public health." 1992 may of the property d it can Staff reviewed its analysis by explaining division of the 30 -acre parcel. Parcel of which 51.7% is upland; Parcel B, which 28.1 % is upland. With respect to Minimum Lot property in a rural zone is ten requirement, with under Section 3 Staff stated meet this re under the Lino L that "all lots shall a cate o "`''ey shows the proposed Mains an existing house and garage, e balance of the property, of ements, a explained the minimum lot size for e proposed newly created lot would meet this y consisting of the 2.5 -acre parcel, as allowed or property in a Rural zone is 330', and both lots will oth lots will have full frontage on a road, as required rdinance, Section 1008.08, subdiv. 6, which states 1 frontage on a publically dedicated street." With respect to buildable • staff stated Lino Lakes City Ordinance Section 3, subd. 3.B.1.b requires parcels requiring a minimum of 10 acres or more to have a minimum of 20% upland area. Much of this property is wetland, and as a result, it was necessary for the applicant to delineate wetland boundaries. Results of that delineation indicate that both lots meet the minimum upland requirement, with Parcel A at 51.7% upland and Parcel B at 28.1% upland. With respect to septic issues, staff explained soils tests confirm that there are soils on both the proposed parcels capable of accommodating a septic system, with enough room for both primary and secondary sites. With respect to property boundaries /encroachment issues, staff noted the western property boundary of the parcel is currently being confirmed, as it appears some of the outbuildings belonging to the property are actually sited on the neighboring property. DRAFT MINUTES